Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Case Commentaries

Establishing Consumer Rights in Real Estate Transactions: Analysis of Sanjeev Dhir v. Unitech Ltd.

Establishing Consumer Rights in Real Estate Transactions: Analysis of Sanjeev Dhir v. Unitech Ltd.

Date: Aug 2, 2016
Establishing Consumer Rights in Real Estate Transactions: Analysis of Sanjeev Dhir v. Unitech Ltd. Introduction The case of Sanjeev Dhir v. Unitech Ltd. adjudicated by the State Consumer Disputes...
Developer Liability for Delayed Possession and Unilateral Changes: Dr. Divya Dahiya v. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers

Developer Liability for Delayed Possession and Unilateral Changes: Dr. Divya Dahiya v. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers

Date: Jul 16, 2016
Developer Liability for Delayed Possession and Unilateral Changes: Dr. Divya Dahiya v. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Introduction The case of Dr. Divya Dahiya v. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh...
Defining Consumer Status in Real Estate: Precedent from Joshi v. S.M.V Agencies Pvt. Ltd.

Defining Consumer Status in Real Estate: Precedent from Joshi v. S.M.V Agencies Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Jun 4, 2016
Defining Consumer Status in Real Estate: Precedent from Joshi v. S.M.V Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Mrs. Kiran Joshi v. S.M.V Agencies Pvt. Limited adjudicated by the State Consumer...
Landmark Ruling: DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. Held Accountable for Delayed Possession Under Consumer Protection Act

Landmark Ruling: DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. Held Accountable for Delayed Possession Under Consumer Protection Act

Date: Jun 3, 2016
Landmark Ruling: DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. Held Accountable for Delayed Possession Under Consumer Protection Act Introduction The case of D.S. Dhanda v. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. marks a...
Enforcing Timely Possession in Real Estate Transactions: Usha Kiran Ghangas v. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.

Enforcing Timely Possession in Real Estate Transactions: Usha Kiran Ghangas v. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Jun 3, 2016
Enforcing Timely Possession in Real Estate Transactions: Usha Kiran Ghangas v. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Usha Kiran Ghangas v. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. was...
Timely Possession and Refund Entitlements in Real Estate Transactions: Insights from Brig Ajay Raina (Retd) v. M/s Unitech Ltd.

Timely Possession and Refund Entitlements in Real Estate Transactions: Insights from Brig Ajay Raina (Retd) v. M/s Unitech Ltd.

Date: May 25, 2016
Timely Possession and Refund Entitlements in Real Estate Transactions: Insights from Brig Ajay Raina (Retd) v. M/s Unitech Ltd. Introduction The case of Brig Ajay Raina (Retd) v. M/s Unitech Ltd....
Affirming Consumer Protections Despite Arbitration Clauses: A Detailed Commentary on Sukhjinder Singh v. M/s IREO Fiveriver Pvt. Ltd.

Affirming Consumer Protections Despite Arbitration Clauses: A Detailed Commentary on Sukhjinder Singh v. M/s IREO Fiveriver Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Apr 19, 2016
Affirming Consumer Protections Despite Arbitration Clauses: A Detailed Commentary on Sukhjinder Singh v. M/s IREO Fiveriver Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Sukhjinder Singh v. M/s IREO Fiveriver...
Consumer Protection Over Arbitration: Insights from Praveen Kumar Arora v. Emaar MGF Land Ltd.

Consumer Protection Over Arbitration: Insights from Praveen Kumar Arora v. Emaar MGF Land Ltd.

Date: Apr 5, 2016
Consumer Protection Over Arbitration: Insights from Praveen Kumar Arora v. Emaar MGF Land Ltd. Introduction The case of Praveen Kumar Arora v. Emaar MGF Land Ltd. heard before the State Consumer...
Consumer Protection Over Arbitration: Insights from Gyanesh Kumar Bhatnagar v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Consumer Protection Over Arbitration: Insights from Gyanesh Kumar Bhatnagar v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Apr 2, 2016
Consumer Protection Over Arbitration: Insights from Gyanesh Kumar Bhatnagar v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Gyanesh Kumar Bhatnagar v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., & Anr. adjudicated...
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Upholds Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Clauses in Real Estate Cases

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Upholds Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Clauses in Real Estate Cases

Date: Apr 2, 2016
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Upholds Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Clauses in Real Estate Cases Introduction The case of Mr. Ashwani Kumar v. M/s PUMA Realtors Private Limited before the...
Consumer Forums Retain Jurisdiction Despite Arbitration Clauses: Insights from Mrs. Nisha Garg v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Consumer Forums Retain Jurisdiction Despite Arbitration Clauses: Insights from Mrs. Nisha Garg v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Apr 2, 2016
Consumer Forums Retain Jurisdiction Despite Arbitration Clauses: Insights from Mrs. Nisha Garg v. M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited Introduction The case of Mrs. Nisha Garg v. M/s Puma Realtors...
Consumer Forums Retain Jurisdiction Despite Arbitration Clauses: Upholding Consumer Remedies in Real Estate Disputes

Consumer Forums Retain Jurisdiction Despite Arbitration Clauses: Upholding Consumer Remedies in Real Estate Disputes

Date: Apr 2, 2016
Consumer Forums Retain Jurisdiction Despite Arbitration Clauses: Upholding Consumer Remedies in Real Estate Disputes Introduction The case of Gurdeep Singh v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., & anr....
Consumer Courts Uphold Jurisdiction Over Real Estate Disputes Despite Arbitration Clauses: Abha Arora v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Consumer Courts Uphold Jurisdiction Over Real Estate Disputes Despite Arbitration Clauses: Abha Arora v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Apr 2, 2016
Consumer Courts Uphold Jurisdiction Over Real Estate Disputes Despite Arbitration Clauses: Abha Arora v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Abha Arora v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd....
Consumer Protection Affirmed Despite Arbitration Clauses in Real Estate Transactions

Consumer Protection Affirmed Despite Arbitration Clauses in Real Estate Transactions

Date: Apr 2, 2016
Consumer Protection Affirmed Despite Arbitration Clauses in Real Estate Transactions Introduction The case of Ram Kumar Singh v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. adjudicated by the State Consumer Disputes...
Consumer Rights Affirmed Despite Arbitration Clauses: Neenu Goel v. M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Sets New Precedent

Consumer Rights Affirmed Despite Arbitration Clauses: Neenu Goel v. M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Sets New Precedent

Date: Apr 2, 2016
Consumer Rights Affirmed Despite Arbitration Clauses: Neenu Goel v. M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Neenu Goel v. M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.,...
Consumer Forums Retain Jurisdiction Over Real Estate Disputes Despite Arbitration Clauses: Varun Narang v. PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Consumer Forums Retain Jurisdiction Over Real Estate Disputes Despite Arbitration Clauses: Varun Narang v. PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Apr 2, 2016
Consumer Forums Retain Jurisdiction Over Real Estate Disputes Despite Arbitration Clauses: Varun Narang v. PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd. 1. Introduction The case of Varun Narang v. PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd....
Paramjit Singh Saini v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.: Affirming Consumer Rights Against Arbitration Clauses

Paramjit Singh Saini v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.: Affirming Consumer Rights Against Arbitration Clauses

Date: Apr 2, 2016
Paramjit Singh Saini v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.: Affirming Consumer Rights Against Arbitration Clauses Introduction The case of Paramjit Singh Saini v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. was adjudicated by the...
Affirming Consumer Forum Jurisdiction Despite Arbitration Clauses: Sandeep Gupta v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Affirming Consumer Forum Jurisdiction Despite Arbitration Clauses: Sandeep Gupta v. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Apr 2, 2016
Affirming Consumer Forum Jurisdiction Despite Arbitration Clauses: Sandeep Gupta v. M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Sandeep Gupta v. M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. was adjudicated...
Consumer Rights Reinforced: Arbitration Clauses Do Not Bar Redressal Under Consumer Protection Act

Consumer Rights Reinforced: Arbitration Clauses Do Not Bar Redressal Under Consumer Protection Act

Date: Mar 10, 2016
Consumer Rights Reinforced: Arbitration Clauses Do Not Bar Redressal Under Consumer Protection Act Introduction The case of Sh. Aditya Sharma vs. DLF Universal Limited adjudicated by the State...
Waiver of Basement Exclusion Clause in Texco Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Tata AIG: A New Precedent in Insurance Law

Waiver of Basement Exclusion Clause in Texco Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Tata AIG: A New Precedent in Insurance Law

Date: Feb 26, 2016
Waiver of Basement Exclusion Clause in Texco Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Tata AIG: A New Precedent in Insurance Law Introduction The case of Texco Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Tata AIG General Insurance Company...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert