Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Commentaries

Unconstitutionality of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules: Implications on CENVAT Credit Utilization – Sandley Industries v. Union of India

Unconstitutionality of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules: Implications on CENVAT Credit Utilization – Sandley Industries v. Union of India

Date: Aug 21, 2015
Unconstitutionality of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules: Implications on CENVAT Credit Utilization Introduction In the landmark case of M/S. Sandley Industries Petitioner v. Union Of India And...
Sarwan Singh v. State Of Haryana: Landmark Ruling on Land Acquisition Compensation

Sarwan Singh v. State Of Haryana: Landmark Ruling on Land Acquisition Compensation

Date: Aug 20, 2015
Sarwan Singh v. State Of Haryana: Landmark Ruling on Land Acquisition Compensation Introduction Sarwan Singh v. State Of Haryana And Another is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Punjab & Haryana...
Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Project Completion Method in Real Estate Taxation

Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Project Completion Method in Real Estate Taxation

Date: Aug 14, 2015
Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Project Completion Method in Real Estate Taxation Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Principal Officer, M/S. Hill View...
Bright Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Establishing Commercial Expediency in Related-Party Interest Deductions

Bright Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Establishing Commercial Expediency in Related-Party Interest Deductions

Date: Jul 25, 2015
Bright Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Establishing Commercial Expediency in Related-Party Interest Deductions Introduction The case of Bright Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v....
Comprehensive Commentary on C.S. Atwal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana And Another S

Comprehensive Commentary on C.S. Atwal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana And Another S

Date: Jul 23, 2015
Deemed Transfer under Section 2(47)(v) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from C.S. Atwal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax 1. Introduction C.S. Atwal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana And...
Broad Interpretation of Section 40A(3) Proviso in Gurdas Garg v. CIT Appeals

Broad Interpretation of Section 40A(3) Proviso in Gurdas Garg v. CIT Appeals

Date: Jul 17, 2015
Broad Interpretation of Section 40A(3) Proviso in Gurdas Garg v. CIT Appeals Introduction The case of Gurdas Garg (S) v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Bathinda And Another (S) adjudicated...
Punjab & Haryana High Court Recognizes Civil Construction and Lease Rentals as Input Services for Cenvat Credit

Punjab & Haryana High Court Recognizes Civil Construction and Lease Rentals as Input Services for Cenvat Credit

Date: Jul 17, 2015
Punjab & Haryana High Court Recognizes Civil Construction and Lease Rentals as Input Services for Cenvat Credit Introduction The case of Commissioner Central Excise Commissionerate, Delhi-III v. M/S....
Principals on Contractual Basis Cannot Be Arbitrarily Replaced: Insights from Dr. Barinder Kaur v. Guru Nanak Dev University

Principals on Contractual Basis Cannot Be Arbitrarily Replaced: Insights from Dr. Barinder Kaur v. Guru Nanak Dev University

Date: Jul 10, 2015
Principals on Contractual Basis Cannot Be Arbitrarily Replaced: Insights from Dr. Barinder Kaur v. Guru Nanak Dev University Introduction The case of Dr. Barinder Kaur v. Guru Nanak Dev University,...
Clarification on Section 54B Exemptions: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shri Dinesh Verma

Clarification on Section 54B Exemptions: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shri Dinesh Verma

Date: Jul 7, 2015
Clarification on Section 54B Exemptions: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shri Dinesh Verma Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Faridabad v. Shri Dinesh Verma was adjudicated by the...
Territorial Jurisdiction in Writ Petitions: Insights from Ex. Dfr. Gurdial Singh v. Union Of India

Territorial Jurisdiction in Writ Petitions: Insights from Ex. Dfr. Gurdial Singh v. Union Of India

Date: Jul 1, 2015
Territorial Jurisdiction in Writ Petitions: Insights from Ex. Dfr. Gurdial Singh v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Ex. Dfr. Gurdial Singh Petitioner v. Union Of India And Others S,...
Estoppel Principles in Correction of Date of Birth: Insights from Ambika Kaul v. Cbse

Estoppel Principles in Correction of Date of Birth: Insights from Ambika Kaul v. Cbse

Date: May 22, 2015
Estoppel Principles in Correction of Date of Birth: Insights from Ambika Kaul v. Cbse Introduction The landmark judgment in Ambika Kaul v. Central Board Of Secondary Education (CBSE) And Others...
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sri Guru Gorakh Nath Charitable Educational Society: A Landmark Judgment on Section 12AA Registration

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sri Guru Gorakh Nath Charitable Educational Society: A Landmark Judgment on Section 12AA Registration

Date: May 6, 2015
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sri Guru Gorakh Nath Charitable Educational Society: A Landmark Judgment on Section 12AA Registration Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sri Guru...
Interpretation and Application of Section 40(a)(ia) in P.M.S Diesels v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax - A Landmark Judgment

Interpretation and Application of Section 40(a)(ia) in P.M.S Diesels v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax - A Landmark Judgment

Date: Apr 30, 2015
Interpretation and Application of Section 40(a)(ia) in P.M.S Diesels v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax - A Landmark Judgment Introduction The case of P.M.S Diesels v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2,...
Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Farman-i-Shahi: New Precedent for Appointment and Management of Non-Sikh Deras

Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Farman-i-Shahi: New Precedent for Appointment and Management of Non-Sikh Deras

Date: Apr 11, 2015
Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Farman-i-Shahi: New Precedent for Appointment and Management of Non-Sikh Deras Introduction The Punjab & Haryana High Court, in its landmark judgment dated April...
Restricting Reassessment Powers under Section 147: Insights from Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

Restricting Reassessment Powers under Section 147: Insights from Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

Date: Mar 11, 2015
Restricting Reassessment Powers under Section 147: Insights from Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India Introduction The case of Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India Pvt....
High Court Affirms 12AA Registration of Apeejay Education Society, Upholding Genuine Educational Activities

High Court Affirms 12AA Registration of Apeejay Education Society, Upholding Genuine Educational Activities

Date: Mar 11, 2015
High Court Affirms 12AA Registration of Apeejay Education Society, Upholding Genuine Educational Activities Introduction The case of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-II, Jalandhar Petitioner(S) v. M/S....
Refund of Court Fees Upon Compromise Settlement: Pradeep Sonawat v. Satish Prakash Satish Chandra

Refund of Court Fees Upon Compromise Settlement: Pradeep Sonawat v. Satish Prakash Satish Chandra

Date: Jan 29, 2015
Refund of Court Fees Upon Compromise Settlement: Pradeep Sonawat v. Satish Prakash Satish Chandra Introduction The case of Pradeep Sonawat v. Satish Prakash Satish Chandra adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Clarifying the Burden of Proof under Section 14A: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S. Abhishek Industries Ltd.

Clarifying the Burden of Proof under Section 14A: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S. Abhishek Industries Ltd.

Date: Jan 28, 2015
Clarifying the Burden of Proof under Section 14A: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S. Abhishek Industries Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/S....
Re-Tendering of Public Contracts: Upholding Fair Play and Procedural Integrity in Contractor Selection

Re-Tendering of Public Contracts: Upholding Fair Play and Procedural Integrity in Contractor Selection

Date: Dec 9, 2014
Re-Tendering of Public Contracts: Upholding Fair Play and Procedural Integrity in Contractor Selection Introduction The case of M/S Brij Gopal Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. State Of Haryana And...
Bonafide Requirement for Ejectment: Reinforcing Standards in Haryana Urban Rent Control

Bonafide Requirement for Ejectment: Reinforcing Standards in Haryana Urban Rent Control

Date: Dec 3, 2014
Bonafide Requirement for Ejectment: Reinforcing Standards in Haryana Urban Rent Control Introduction The case of Brij Bhushan And Another Petitioners v. Sanjay Harjai And Another S, adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert