Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Commentaries

Punjab & Haryana High Court Establishes Variable Compensation Calculation Based on Land Location and Development Potential in Madan Pal III v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana High Court Establishes Variable Compensation Calculation Based on Land Location and Development Potential in Madan Pal III v. State of Haryana

Date: Mar 10, 2018
Punjab & Haryana High Court Establishes Variable Compensation Calculation Based on Land Location and Development Potential in Madan Pal III v. State of Haryana Introduction Madan Pal III v. State Of...
Interest on Solatium under the Land Acquisition Act: Insights from Jalandhar Improvement Trust v. Kartar Singh & Others

Interest on Solatium under the Land Acquisition Act: Insights from Jalandhar Improvement Trust v. Kartar Singh & Others

Date: Dec 22, 2017
Interest on Solatium under the Land Acquisition Act: Insights from Jalandhar Improvement Trust v. Kartar Singh & Others Introduction The case of Jalandhar Improvement Trust, Jalandhar v. Kartar Singh...
Mandate of Central Sanction in Prosecution of Police Officials under Punjab Disturbed Areas Act, 1983: Insights from Arjan Singh v. CBI

Mandate of Central Sanction in Prosecution of Police Officials under Punjab Disturbed Areas Act, 1983: Insights from Arjan Singh v. CBI

Date: Dec 21, 2017
Mandate of Central Sanction in Prosecution of Police Officials under Punjab Disturbed Areas Act, 1983: Insights from Arjan Singh v. CBI Introduction The case of Arjan Singh And Others Petitioners v....
Rajiv Manchanda v. Haryana Urban Development Authority: Establishing Clear Guidelines for Oustees' Rights in Land Allotment

Rajiv Manchanda v. Haryana Urban Development Authority: Establishing Clear Guidelines for Oustees' Rights in Land Allotment

Date: Nov 23, 2017
Rajiv Manchanda v. Haryana Urban Development Authority: Establishing Clear Guidelines for Oustees' Rights in Land Allotment Introduction The case of Rajiv Manchanda And Ors. v. Haryana Urban...
Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Equitable Treatment in Recruitment Under Backward Class Category

Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Equitable Treatment in Recruitment Under Backward Class Category

Date: Sep 8, 2017
Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Equitable Treatment in Recruitment Under Backward Class Category 1. Introduction The case of Jaspreet Kaur vs. State of Punjab and Others (2017 PHHC 86308) was...
Strict Compliance and Scrutiny in NDPS Cases: Insights from Gannu & Others v. State of Punjab

Strict Compliance and Scrutiny in NDPS Cases: Insights from Gannu & Others v. State of Punjab

Date: May 27, 2017
Strict Compliance and Scrutiny in NDPS Cases: Insights from Gannu & Others v. State of Punjab Introduction The case of Gannu And Another v. State Of Punjab, adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High...
Clarifying Inherent Jurisdiction: High Court’s Landmark Decision in Rajinder Singh v. State of Punjab

Clarifying Inherent Jurisdiction: High Court’s Landmark Decision in Rajinder Singh v. State of Punjab

Date: May 17, 2017
Clarifying Inherent Jurisdiction: High Court’s Landmark Decision in Rajinder Singh v. State of Punjab Introduction The case of Rajinder Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr. adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Parole Eligibility for Non-Hardcore Prisoners: RAM CHANDER v. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

Parole Eligibility for Non-Hardcore Prisoners: RAM CHANDER v. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

Date: Mar 7, 2017
Parole Eligibility for Non-Hardcore Prisoners: RAM CHANDER v. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS Introduction The case of Ram Chander v. State of Punjab & Ors pertains to the petitioner's request for temporary...
Limits of Article 226 in Excise Fee Rebate Claims: Somrass Traders v. State of Punjab

Limits of Article 226 in Excise Fee Rebate Claims: Somrass Traders v. State of Punjab

Date: Feb 28, 2017
Limits of Article 226 in Excise Fee Rebate Claims: Somrass Traders & Anr v. State of Punjab & Ors Introduction The case of M/s Somrass Traders & Anr v. State of Punjab & Ors adjudicated by the Punjab...
Res Judicata Principles Applied in Dismissal of Transfer Applications to National Green Tribunal

Res Judicata Principles Applied in Dismissal of Transfer Applications to National Green Tribunal

Date: Feb 23, 2017
Res Judicata Principles Applied in Dismissal of Transfer Applications to National Green Tribunal Introduction The case of Sunil Singh v. Ministry of Environment and Forests adjudicated by the Punjab...
High Court Ruling in THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PATIALA v. STATE BANK OF PATIALA: Clarifying the Applicability of Section 14A for Stock-in-Trade Income

High Court Ruling in THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PATIALA v. STATE BANK OF PATIALA: Clarifying the Applicability of Section 14A for Stock-in-Trade Income

Date: Jan 31, 2017
High Court Ruling in THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PATIALA v. STATE BANK OF PATIALA: Clarifying the Applicability of Section 14A for Stock-in-Trade Income Introduction The Punjab & Haryana High...
High Court Upholds Notional Income Assessment for Vacant Properties in Susham Singla v. Commissioner of Income Tax

High Court Upholds Notional Income Assessment for Vacant Properties in Susham Singla v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Date: Dec 24, 2016
High Court Upholds Notional Income Assessment for Vacant Properties in Susham Singla v. Commissioner of Income Tax Introduction The case of Susham Singla v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala...
STATE OF PUNJAB v. MANOHAR SINGH: Upholding State's Right to Recover Use & Occupation Charges Under Punjab Land Revenue Act

STATE OF PUNJAB v. MANOHAR SINGH: Upholding State's Right to Recover Use & Occupation Charges Under Punjab Land Revenue Act

Date: Dec 15, 2016
STATE OF PUNJAB v. MANOHAR SINGH: Upholding State's Right to Recover Use & Occupation Charges Under Punjab Land Revenue Act Introduction The case of State of Punjab v. Manohar Singh revolves around a...
Family Pension Non-Deductible in Compensation Awards: Insights from Smt. Gurdev Kaur v. Jharmal Singh

Family Pension Non-Deductible in Compensation Awards: Insights from Smt. Gurdev Kaur v. Jharmal Singh

Date: Nov 22, 2016
Family Pension Non-Deductible in Compensation Awards: Insights from Smt. Gurdev Kaur And Others v. Jharmal Singh And Another Introduction Case: Smt. Gurdev Kaur And Others v. Jharmal Singh And...
Eligibility Criteria for Section 80P(2)(a)(i) Deductions: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd.

Eligibility Criteria for Section 80P(2)(a)(i) Deductions: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd.

Date: Nov 12, 2016
Eligibility Criteria for Section 80P(2)(a)(i) Deductions: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. Introduction The case...
Interim Custody of NDPS-Seized Vehicles Permissible Under Section 451 Cr.P.C.: Punjab & Haryana High Court Ruling

Interim Custody of NDPS-Seized Vehicles Permissible Under Section 451 Cr.P.C.: Punjab & Haryana High Court Ruling

Date: Sep 20, 2016
Interim Custody of NDPS-Seized Vehicles Permissible Under Section 451 Cr.P.C.: Punjab & Haryana High Court Ruling Introduction In the case of Gurbinder Singh Shinder Petitioner v. State Of Punjab,...
Tribunal's Discretion in Raising Additional Grounds: Insights from M/S. Vmt Spinning Co. Ltd. v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

Tribunal's Discretion in Raising Additional Grounds: Insights from M/S. Vmt Spinning Co. Ltd. v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Sep 17, 2016
Tribunal's Discretion in Raising Additional Grounds: Insights from M/S. Vmt Spinning Co. Ltd. v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of M/S. Vmt Spinning Co. Ltd. v. The Commissioner...
Munjal Sales Corporation v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Inadmissibility of Mid-Year Accounting System Switch

Munjal Sales Corporation v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Inadmissibility of Mid-Year Accounting System Switch

Date: Aug 25, 2016
Munjal Sales Corporation v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Inadmissibility of Mid-Year Accounting System Switch Introduction The case of Munjal Sales Corporation v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,...
Flexibility in Transfer Pricing Comparables Selection and Export Turnover Calculations: Insights from CIT Faridabad v. Mercer Consulting

Flexibility in Transfer Pricing Comparables Selection and Export Turnover Calculations: Insights from CIT Faridabad v. Mercer Consulting

Date: Aug 25, 2016
Flexibility in Transfer Pricing Comparables Selection and Export Turnover Calculations: Insights from CIT Faridabad v. M/S Mercer Consulting (India) Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon Introduction The case of The...
Punjab & Haryana High Court's Landmark Ruling on Section 9D Compliance in Central Excise Adjudications

Punjab & Haryana High Court's Landmark Ruling on Section 9D Compliance in Central Excise Adjudications

Date: Jun 23, 2016
Punjab & Haryana High Court's Landmark Ruling on Section 9D Compliance in Central Excise Adjudications Introduction The case of M/S. G-Tech Industries Petitioner v. Union Of India And Another S...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert