Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Commentaries

Overruling Bata India Limited: Implications for Purchase Tax on Consignment Transfers

Overruling Bata India Limited: Implications for Purchase Tax on Consignment Transfers

Date: Jan 25, 1985
Overruling Bata India Limited: Implications for Purchase Tax on Consignment Transfers Introduction The case of Des Raj Pushap Kumar Gulati v. The State Of Punjab And Another adjudicated by the Punjab...
Interpretation and Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements in Construction Contracts: Insights from Shri Girdhari Lal Bansal v. Bhakra Beas Management Board

Interpretation and Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements in Construction Contracts: Insights from Shri Girdhari Lal Bansal v. Bhakra Beas Management Board

Date: Jan 22, 1985
Interpretation and Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements in Construction Contracts: Insights from Shri Girdhari Lal Bansal v. Bhakra Beas Management Board Introduction The case of Shri Girdhari Lal...
Barkat Singh v. Hans Raj Pandit: Defining the Jurisdictional Boundaries of Motor Accident Claims Tribunals

Barkat Singh v. Hans Raj Pandit: Defining the Jurisdictional Boundaries of Motor Accident Claims Tribunals

Date: Nov 17, 1984
Barkat Singh v. Hans Raj Pandit: Defining the Jurisdictional Boundaries of Motor Accident Claims Tribunals Introduction The case of Barkat Singh and Others v. Hans Raj Pandit and Others was...
Haryana Rural Development Fund Act Invalidated: A Landmark Decision on Quid Pro Quo in State-Imposed Cesses

Haryana Rural Development Fund Act Invalidated: A Landmark Decision on Quid Pro Quo in State-Imposed Cesses

Date: Oct 14, 1984
Haryana Rural Development Fund Act Invalidated: A Landmark Decision on Quid Pro Quo in State-Imposed Cesses Introduction The case of Shri Om Parkash And Others v. Shri Giri Raj Kishore And Others was...
Discretionary Treatment of Preliminary Issues Under Order 14, Rule 2: Daljit Singh v. S. Joginder Singh Shekhon

Discretionary Treatment of Preliminary Issues Under Order 14, Rule 2: Daljit Singh v. S. Joginder Singh Shekhon

Date: Sep 29, 1984
Discretionary Treatment of Preliminary Issues Under Order 14, Rule 2: Daljit Singh v. S. Joginder Singh Shekhon Introduction The case of Daljit Singh v. S. Joginder Singh Shekhon adjudicated by the...
Insurer's Liability Under No-Fault Provisions Confirmed: Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Beasa Devi And Ors

Insurer's Liability Under No-Fault Provisions Confirmed: Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Beasa Devi And Ors

Date: Sep 28, 1984
Insurer's Liability Under No-Fault Provisions Confirmed: Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Beasa Devi And Ors Introduction The case of Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Beasa...
Budh Ram v. State of Haryana: Defining Primary Food and Interpreting 'Sale' under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act

Budh Ram v. State of Haryana: Defining Primary Food and Interpreting 'Sale' under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act

Date: Aug 23, 1984
Budh Ram v. State of Haryana: Defining Primary Food and Interpreting 'Sale' under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Introduction Case: Budh Ram (Deceased) v. State Of Haryana Court: Punjab &...
Promotion Rights in Public Service: Insights from State of Punjab v. Sh. Ram Singh

Promotion Rights in Public Service: Insights from State of Punjab v. Sh. Ram Singh

Date: May 29, 1984
Promotion Rights in Public Service: Insights from State of Punjab v. Sh. Ram Singh Introduction The case of State of Punjab v. Sh. Ram Singh adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on May 28,...
Limitation on Extension of Time for Conditional Decrees under Section 148 CPC: Insights from Parmeshri Appellent v. Naurata

Limitation on Extension of Time for Conditional Decrees under Section 148 CPC: Insights from Parmeshri Appellent v. Naurata

Date: May 11, 1984
Limitation on Extension of Time for Conditional Decrees under Section 148 CPC: Insights from Parmeshri Appellent v. Naurata Introduction The case of Parmeshri Appellent v. Naurata adjudicated by the...
Authority to Represent in Corporate Petitions: Insights from Col. Kuldip Singh Dhillon v. Paragaon Utility Financiers Ltd.

Authority to Represent in Corporate Petitions: Insights from Col. Kuldip Singh Dhillon v. Paragaon Utility Financiers Ltd.

Date: May 9, 1984
Authority to Represent in Corporate Petitions: Insights from Col. Kuldip Singh Dhillon v. Paragaon Utility Financiers Ltd. Introduction The case of Col. Kuldip Singh Dhillon And Others v. Paragaon...
Sardari Lal Gupta v. Siri Krishan Aggarwal: Redefining Rights in Party-Wall Disputes

Sardari Lal Gupta v. Siri Krishan Aggarwal: Redefining Rights in Party-Wall Disputes

Date: May 2, 1984
Sardari Lal Gupta v. Siri Krishan Aggarwal: Redefining Rights in Party-Wall Disputes Introduction Sardari Lal Gupta v. Siri Krishan Aggarwal is a significant judgment delivered by the Punjab &...
Limits of Conclusive Evidence under Section 42 of the Punjab Town Improvement Act: Prof. Jodh Singh v. Jullundur Improvement Trust

Limits of Conclusive Evidence under Section 42 of the Punjab Town Improvement Act: Prof. Jodh Singh v. Jullundur Improvement Trust

Date: Apr 28, 1984
Limits of Conclusive Evidence under Section 42 of the Punjab Town Improvement Act: Prof. Jodh Singh v. Jullundur Improvement Trust Introduction The case of Prof. Jodh Singh And Others v. Jullundur...
Trademark Infringement and Consumer Confusion: The BEPLEX vs. BELPLEX Landmark Judgment

Trademark Infringement and Consumer Confusion: The BEPLEX vs. BELPLEX Landmark Judgment

Date: Mar 23, 1984
Trademark Infringement and Consumer Confusion: The BEPLEX vs. BELPLEX Landmark Judgment Introduction The case of Anglo-French Drug Co. (Eastern) Ltd. (Bombay) v. M/S. Belco Pharma (Haryana)...
Interpretation of Sub-Clause (e) of Clause (ii) of Explanation II to Rule 1D: Ashok Kumar Oswal (Minor) v. Commissioner Of Wealth Tax

Interpretation of Sub-Clause (e) of Clause (ii) of Explanation II to Rule 1D: Ashok Kumar Oswal (Minor) v. Commissioner Of Wealth Tax

Date: Mar 13, 1984
Interpretation of Sub-Clause (e) of Clause (ii) of Explanation II to Rule 1D: Ashok Kumar Oswal (Minor) v. Commissioner Of Wealth Tax Introduction Ashok Kumar Oswal (Minor) v. Commissioner Of Wealth...
Clarification on Anticipatory Bail Jurisdiction: Overruling Balwant Singh and Ram Lal Precedents

Clarification on Anticipatory Bail Jurisdiction: Overruling Balwant Singh and Ram Lal Precedents

Date: Mar 2, 1984
Clarification on Anticipatory Bail Jurisdiction: Overruling Balwant Singh and Ram Lal Precedents Introduction The case of Puran Singh v. Ajit Singh And Anr, adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High...
Sarwan Kumar v. State of Punjab: Upholding the Right to Fair Hearing in Election Challenges

Sarwan Kumar v. State of Punjab: Upholding the Right to Fair Hearing in Election Challenges

Date: Feb 24, 1984
Sarwan Kumar v. State of Punjab: Upholding the Right to Fair Hearing in Election Challenges Introduction The case of Sarwan Kumar v. State of Punjab And Ors adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High...
Limitation Periods Under Rule 18: Applicability to Schemes under Section 42 of East Punjab Holdings Act, 1948 – Jagtar Singh v. AD Consolidation of Holdings Jullundur (1984)

Limitation Periods Under Rule 18: Applicability to Schemes under Section 42 of East Punjab Holdings Act, 1948 – Jagtar Singh v. AD Consolidation of Holdings Jullundur (1984)

Date: Feb 22, 1984
Limitation Periods Under Rule 18: Applicability to Schemes under Section 42 of East Punjab Holdings Act, 1948 – Jagtar Singh v. Additional Director, Consolidation of Holdings Jullundur (1984)...
Requirement to Record Reasons for Declining Auction Bids by Settlement Officers

Requirement to Record Reasons for Declining Auction Bids by Settlement Officers

Date: Feb 14, 1984
Requirement to Record Reasons for Declining Auction Bids by Settlement Officers Introduction The case of Surja Ram v. State of Haryana and Anr adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on...
Maintenance Pendente Lite Survives Dismissal of Main Petitions: Insights from Sohan Lal v. Smt. Kamlesh

Maintenance Pendente Lite Survives Dismissal of Main Petitions: Insights from Sohan Lal v. Smt. Kamlesh

Date: Feb 7, 1984
Maintenance Pendente Lite Survives Dismissal of Main Petitions: Insights from Sohan Lal v. Smt. Kamlesh Introduction The case of Sohan Lal v. Smt. Kamlesh adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High...
Extension of Limitation Period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act: Insights from Manoj Ahuja v. IAC of Income-Tax

Extension of Limitation Period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act: Insights from Manoj Ahuja v. IAC of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 1, 1984
Extension of Limitation Period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act: Insights from Manoj Ahuja v. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Manoj Ahuja and Another v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert