Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Commentaries

Equal Pay and Regularisation of Casual Labourers in Maninder Kaur v. State Of Punjab

Equal Pay and Regularisation of Casual Labourers in Maninder Kaur v. State Of Punjab

Date: May 16, 2003
Equal Pay and Regularisation of Casual Labourers in Maninder Kaur v. State Of Punjab Introduction The case of Maninder Kaur v. State Of Punjab adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on May...
Amar Kaur v. Paramjit Kaur: Upholding the Validity of Registered Wills and Decrees in Property Disputes

Amar Kaur v. Paramjit Kaur: Upholding the Validity of Registered Wills and Decrees in Property Disputes

Date: Apr 4, 2003
Amar Kaur v. Paramjit Kaur: Upholding the Validity of Registered Wills and Decrees in Property Disputes Introduction In the landmark case of Amar Kaur v. Paramjit Kaur, adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Establishing Possessory Rights Through Unregistered Sale Agreements: Jeet Kumari v. Girdhari Lal

Establishing Possessory Rights Through Unregistered Sale Agreements: Jeet Kumari v. Girdhari Lal

Date: Apr 3, 2003
Establishing Possessory Rights Through Unregistered Sale Agreements: Jeet Kumari v. Girdhari Lal Introduction The case of Jeet Kumari v. Girdhari Lal adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on...
Affirming Waiver of Arbitration Agreements Through Judicial Proceedings: Smt. Sudershan Chopra v. Company Law Board

Affirming Waiver of Arbitration Agreements Through Judicial Proceedings: Smt. Sudershan Chopra v. Company Law Board

Date: Mar 15, 2003
Affirming Waiver of Arbitration Agreements Through Judicial Proceedings: Smt. Sudershan Chopra v. Company Law Board 1. Introduction The case of Smt. Sudershan Chopra v. Company Law Board adjudicated...
Clarifying Property Vesting: Jai Singh & Others v. State of Haryana Establishes Distinction between Earmarked Common Lands and Bachat Lands

Clarifying Property Vesting: Jai Singh & Others v. State of Haryana Establishes Distinction between Earmarked Common Lands and Bachat Lands

Date: Mar 14, 2003
Clarifying Property Vesting: Jai Singh & Others v. State of Haryana Establishes Distinction between Earmarked Common Lands and Bachat Lands Introduction The case of Jai Singh & Others v. State of...
Enhanced Scrutiny of Tax Assessments: Insights from Mohinder Singh Malik v. Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Enhanced Scrutiny of Tax Assessments: Insights from Mohinder Singh Malik v. Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Mar 12, 2003
Enhanced Scrutiny of Tax Assessments: Insights from Mohinder Singh Malik v. Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Mohinder Singh Malik v. Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax...
Waiver of Eviction Grounds Under Haryana Urban Rent Act: Smt. Jangiro Devi v. Smt. Kailasho Devi

Waiver of Eviction Grounds Under Haryana Urban Rent Act: Smt. Jangiro Devi v. Smt. Kailasho Devi

Date: Feb 27, 2003
Waiver of Eviction Grounds Under Haryana Urban Rent Act: Smt. Jangiro Devi v. Smt. Kailasho Devi Introduction The case of Smt. Jangiro Devi v. Smt. Kailasho Devi adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana...
Evidentiary Estoppel in Tenant-Landlord Relationships: Hukma Devi v. Bhagwan Dass

Evidentiary Estoppel in Tenant-Landlord Relationships: Hukma Devi v. Bhagwan Dass

Date: Feb 12, 2003
Evidentiary Estoppel in Tenant-Landlord Relationships: Hukma Devi v. Bhagwan Dass Introduction The case of Hukma Devi Petitioners v. Bhagwan Dass adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on...
Independent Judicial Evaluation in Dhanraj Singh v. State of Punjab

Independent Judicial Evaluation in Dhanraj Singh v. State of Punjab

Date: Jan 29, 2003
Independent Judicial Evaluation in Dhanraj Singh v. State of Punjab Introduction The case of Dhanraj Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on January 28,...
Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Criteria for Eviction under Haryana Urban Rent Act

Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Criteria for Eviction under Haryana Urban Rent Act

Date: Jan 25, 2003
Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Criteria for Eviction under Haryana Urban Rent Act Introduction In the case of State Bank Of Patiala v. S. Zulzuaoar Singh Virk And Others, adjudicated by the...
Devgon Rice and General Mills v. Commissioner of Income-Tax: Reinforcing Reassessment Protocols under Sections 147(a) and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Devgon Rice and General Mills v. Commissioner of Income-Tax: Reinforcing Reassessment Protocols under Sections 147(a) and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Date: Jan 23, 2003
Devgon Rice and General Mills v. Commissioner of Income-Tax: Reinforcing Reassessment Protocols under Sections 147(a) and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Introduction The case of Devgon Rice and...
Clarification on the Invocation of Section 30(3) of the Insecticides Act under Section 482 CrPC

Clarification on the Invocation of Section 30(3) of the Insecticides Act under Section 482 CrPC

Date: Jan 18, 2003
Clarification on the Invocation of Section 30(3) of the Insecticides Act under Section 482 CrPC Introduction The case of Rajinder Kumar v. State Of Punjab, adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High...
Essential Commodities Act Compliance: High Court Quashes FIR for Procedural Lapses in Fertilizer Regulation

Essential Commodities Act Compliance: High Court Quashes FIR for Procedural Lapses in Fertilizer Regulation

Date: Jan 9, 2003
Essential Commodities Act Compliance: High Court Quashes FIR for Procedural Lapses in Fertilizer Regulation Introduction In the landmark case of S.C. Sharma and Another Petitioners v. State of...
Smt. Daljit Kaur v. The State Of Punjab And Another: Upholding Applicant Seniority in Residential Plot Allotment

Smt. Daljit Kaur v. The State Of Punjab And Another: Upholding Applicant Seniority in Residential Plot Allotment

Date: Dec 17, 2002
Smt. Daljit Kaur v. The State Of Punjab And Another: Upholding Applicant Seniority in Residential Plot Allotment Introduction Smt. Daljit Kaur v. The State Of Punjab And Another is a pivotal judgment...
Punjab & Haryana High Court Rules on Dual-Use Buildings Under East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949

Punjab & Haryana High Court Rules on Dual-Use Buildings Under East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949

Date: Dec 12, 2002
Punjab & Haryana High Court Rules on Dual-Use Buildings Under East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 Introduction The case of Harjit Singh Petitioner v. Daya Ram Sat Narain adjudicated by the...
Reaffirming the Necessity of Intent and Severity in Section 307 IPC Charges: Analysis of Gurmit Singh v. U.T Chandigarh

Reaffirming the Necessity of Intent and Severity in Section 307 IPC Charges: Analysis of Gurmit Singh v. U.T Chandigarh

Date: Dec 5, 2002
Reaffirming the Necessity of Intent and Severity in Section 307 IPC Charges: Analysis of Gurmit Singh v. U.T Chandigarh Introduction The case of Gurmit Singh Petitioners v. U.T Chandigarh adjudicated...
Bar on Subsequent Writ Petitions Post Withdrawal Without Permission: M/S Inderjit Poultry Farm v. State Bank of Patiala

Bar on Subsequent Writ Petitions Post Withdrawal Without Permission: M/S Inderjit Poultry Farm v. State Bank of Patiala

Date: Dec 3, 2002
Bar on Subsequent Writ Petitions Post Withdrawal Without Permission: M/S Inderjit Poultry Farm v. State Bank of Patiala Introduction The case of M/S Inderjit Poultry Farm & Others v. State Bank Of...
Reclassification of Juveniles in Conflict with Law under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000: A Commentary on Sanjeev Kumar v. State Of Haryana

Reclassification of Juveniles in Conflict with Law under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000: A Commentary on Sanjeev Kumar v. State Of Haryana

Date: Nov 22, 2002
Reclassification of Juveniles in Conflict with Law under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000: A Commentary on Sanjeev Kumar v. State Of Haryana Introduction The case of Sanjeev Kumar Petitioner v. State...
Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Family Settlement in Jagdish v. Ram Karan

Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Family Settlement in Jagdish v. Ram Karan

Date: Oct 24, 2002
Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Family Settlement in Jagdish v. Ram Karan Introduction In the landmark case of Jagdish v. Ram Karan, adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on October 23,...
Recognition of Maintenance Rights of Widowed Daughter-in-Law Against Gifted Self-Acquired Property: Balbir Kaur v. Harinder Kaur

Recognition of Maintenance Rights of Widowed Daughter-in-Law Against Gifted Self-Acquired Property: Balbir Kaur v. Harinder Kaur

Date: Sep 27, 2002
Recognition of Maintenance Rights of Widowed Daughter-in-Law Against Gifted Self-Acquired Property Introduction The case of Balbir Kaur v. Harinder Kaur adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert