Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Commentaries

Porrits And Spencer (Asia) Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Landmark Ruling on Speculative Transactions and Tax Set-Offs

Porrits And Spencer (Asia) Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Landmark Ruling on Speculative Transactions and Tax Set-Offs

Date: Apr 1, 2010
Porrits And Spencer (Asia) Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Landmark Ruling on Speculative Transactions and Tax Set-Offs Introduction The case of Porrits And Spencer (Asia) Ltd. v. Commissioner Of...
Attributing Disability Pension to Military Service During Leave: Insights from Union Of India v. Khushbash Singh

Attributing Disability Pension to Military Service During Leave: Insights from Union Of India v. Khushbash Singh

Date: Apr 1, 2010
Attributing Disability Pension to Military Service During Leave: Insights from Union Of India v. Khushbash Singh Introduction The case of Union Of India v. Khushbash Singh, decided by the Punjab &...
Strict Adherence to Procedural Norms in Election Petitions: Insights from Gurlal Singh v. Presiding Officer

Strict Adherence to Procedural Norms in Election Petitions: Insights from Gurlal Singh v. Presiding Officer

Date: Mar 27, 2010
Strict Adherence to Procedural Norms in Election Petitions: Insights from Gurlal Singh v. Presiding Officer Introduction The case of Gurlal Singh v. Presiding Officer, Election Tribunal adjudicated...
Judicial Scrutiny of Forensic Evidence: Establishing the Preeminence of Corroborative Medical Evidence in Poisoning Offenses – Anita v. State of Haryana

Judicial Scrutiny of Forensic Evidence: Establishing the Preeminence of Corroborative Medical Evidence in Poisoning Offenses – Anita v. State of Haryana

Date: Mar 23, 2010
Judicial Scrutiny of Forensic Evidence: Establishing the Preeminence of Corroborative Medical Evidence in Poisoning Offenses – Anita v. State of Haryana Introduction Anita v. State of Haryana is a...
Strict Compliance in Service of Arbitration Awards Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act: Insights from Harchand Singh v. M/S Reliable Agro Engineering Services

Strict Compliance in Service of Arbitration Awards Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act: Insights from Harchand Singh v. M/S Reliable Agro Engineering Services

Date: Mar 5, 2010
Strict Compliance in Service of Arbitration Awards Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act: Insights from Harchand Singh v. M/S Reliable Agro Engineering Services Introduction The case of Harchand...
Degree Recognition from Universities Established Under Struck-Down Acts: Neelam Devi v. Haryana Nurses Registration Council

Degree Recognition from Universities Established Under Struck-Down Acts: Neelam Devi v. Haryana Nurses Registration Council

Date: Feb 20, 2010
Degree Recognition from Universities Established Under Struck-Down Acts: Neelam Devi v. Haryana Nurses Registration Council Introduction The case of Ms. Neelam Devi And Another Petitioners v. Haryana...
Reaffirmation of Muslim Personal Law in Child Marriage: Kammu v. State Of Haryana

Reaffirmation of Muslim Personal Law in Child Marriage: Kammu v. State Of Haryana

Date: Feb 17, 2010
Reaffirmation of Muslim Personal Law in Child Marriage: Kammu v. State Of Haryana Introduction The case of Kammu v. State Of Haryana And Others adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on...
Reinterpretation of Section 307 IPC in Mohinder Singh v. State Of Punjab: A Landmark Judgment

Reinterpretation of Section 307 IPC in Mohinder Singh v. State Of Punjab: A Landmark Judgment

Date: Feb 12, 2010
Reinterpretation of Section 307 IPC in Mohinder Singh v. State Of Punjab: A Landmark Judgment 1. Introduction The case of Mohinder Singh And Another v. State Of Punjab And Another adjudicated by the...
Eligibility of Higher Qualifications in Public Service Recruitment: Insights from Manjit Singh v. State Of Punjab and Another

Eligibility of Higher Qualifications in Public Service Recruitment: Insights from Manjit Singh v. State Of Punjab and Another

Date: Feb 6, 2010
Eligibility of Higher Qualifications in Public Service Recruitment: Insights from Manjit Singh v. State Of Punjab and Another Introduction Manjit Singh v. State Of Punjab and Another is a landmark...
Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Tax Exemptions for Educational Institutions under Section 10(23C)(vi)

Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Tax Exemptions for Educational Institutions under Section 10(23C)(vi)

Date: Jan 30, 2010
Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Tax Exemptions for Educational Institutions under Section 10(23C)(vi) Introduction The case of Pine Grove International Charitable v. Union Of India And Others...
Recognition of Distance Education Diplomas from Deemed Universities: Vikash Kumar v. Haryana State Pollution Control Board

Recognition of Distance Education Diplomas from Deemed Universities: Vikash Kumar v. Haryana State Pollution Control Board

Date: Jan 14, 2010
Recognition of Distance Education Diplomas from Deemed Universities: Vikash Kumar v. Haryana State Pollution Control Board Introduction The case of Vikash Kumar Petitioner v. Haryana State Pollution...
Concurrent Sentencing under Section 427 Cr.P.C: A Comprehensive Analysis of Sameer Ahmad And Others v. State Of Haryana

Concurrent Sentencing under Section 427 Cr.P.C: A Comprehensive Analysis of Sameer Ahmad And Others v. State Of Haryana

Date: Jan 8, 2010
Concurrent Sentencing under Section 427 Cr.P.C: A Comprehensive Analysis of Sameer Ahmad And Others v. State Of Haryana Introduction The case of Sameer Ahmad And Others v. State Of Haryana,...
Clarification on Tenant Eviction Procedure under Section 13(2)(i): Rajan v. Rakesh Kumar Ruling Sets Important Precedent

Clarification on Tenant Eviction Procedure under Section 13(2)(i): Rajan v. Rakesh Kumar Ruling Sets Important Precedent

Date: Jan 8, 2010
Clarification on Tenant Eviction Procedure under Section 13(2)(i): Rajan v. Rakesh Kumar Ruling Sets Important Precedent Introduction The case of Rajan Alias Raj Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar adjudicated by...
Upholding Rape Conviction with Medical Evidence: Ram Niwas v. State Of Haryana

Upholding Rape Conviction with Medical Evidence: Ram Niwas v. State Of Haryana

Date: Jan 7, 2010
Upholding Rape Conviction with Medical Evidence: Ram Niwas v. State Of Haryana Introduction The case of Ram Niwas v. State Of Haryana was adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on January 6,...
Establishing Evidential Connection in Excise Act Offences: State Of Haryana v. Randhir Singh

Establishing Evidential Connection in Excise Act Offences: State Of Haryana v. Randhir Singh

Date: Jan 7, 2010
Establishing Evidential Connection in Excise Act Offences: State Of Haryana v. Randhir Singh Introduction The case of State Of Haryana v. Randhir Singh adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court...
Acquittal on Grounds of Doubt and Granting of Probation: Hari Singh v. State Of Punjab

Acquittal on Grounds of Doubt and Granting of Probation: Hari Singh v. State Of Punjab

Date: Jan 7, 2010
Acquittal on Grounds of Doubt and Granting of Probation: Hari Singh v. State Of Punjab Introduction The case of Hari Singh And Others Petitioners v. State Of Punjab adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Defining the Threshold for Abetment to Suicide under Section 306 IPC: Insights from Raj Pal Bahl v. State Of Haryana

Defining the Threshold for Abetment to Suicide under Section 306 IPC: Insights from Raj Pal Bahl v. State Of Haryana

Date: Jan 7, 2010
Defining the Threshold for Abetment to Suicide under Section 306 IPC: Insights from Raj Pal Bahl v. State Of Haryana Introduction Raj Pal Bahl and Another v. State Of Haryana is a landmark judgment...
Requirement of Clear Demand and Acceptance for Conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act

Requirement of Clear Demand and Acceptance for Conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act

Date: Dec 22, 2009
Requirement of Clear Demand and Acceptance for Conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act Introduction The case Harbans Singh v. State Of Punjab ([Punjab & Haryana High Court, 21 December...
High Court Upholds Supervisory Role of Company Court over Securitization Companies under SARFAESI Act

High Court Upholds Supervisory Role of Company Court over Securitization Companies under SARFAESI Act

Date: Dec 16, 2009
High Court Upholds Supervisory Role of Company Court over Securitization Companies under SARFAESI Act Introduction The case of Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation v....
Clarification on Section 54F Exemption and Appeal Maintainability in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Abhinash Gupta

Clarification on Section 54F Exemption and Appeal Maintainability in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Abhinash Gupta

Date: Dec 12, 2009
Clarification on Section 54F Exemption and Appeal Maintainability in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Abhinash Gupta Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Abhinash Gupta was adjudicated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert