Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Interpretation of Section 488 Cr PC in Maintenance Proceedings: Ram Kishore v. Bimla Devi

Interpretation of Section 488 Cr PC in Maintenance Proceedings: Ram Kishore v. Bimla Devi

Date: Jan 10, 1957
Interpretation of Section 488 Cr PC in Maintenance Proceedings: Ram Kishore v. Bimla Devi Introduction The case Ram Kishore v. Bimla Devi adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on January 9, 1957,...
Judgment Analysis: Pooran Singh & Others v. The Additional Commissioner Agra

Judgment Analysis: Pooran Singh & Others v. The Additional Commissioner Agra

Date: Jan 5, 1957
Pooran Singh & Others v. The Additional Commissioner Agra: A Landmark Judgment on Writ Jurisdiction and Judicial Discretion Introduction The case of Pooran Singh And Others v. The Additional...
Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. J.K Jute Mills Co. Ltd.: Upholding the Doctrine of Indoor Management

Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. J.K Jute Mills Co. Ltd.: Upholding the Doctrine of Indoor Management

Date: Dec 22, 1956
Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. J.K Jute Mills Co. Ltd.: Upholding the Doctrine of Indoor Management Introduction The case of Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Co. Ltd., Kanpur v. J.K Jute Mills Co....
Res Judicata and Nearest Reversioner in Hindu Law: Insights from Mst. Sudehaiya Kunwar v. Ram Dass Pandey

Res Judicata and Nearest Reversioner in Hindu Law: Insights from Mst. Sudehaiya Kunwar v. Ram Dass Pandey

Date: Dec 6, 1956
Res Judicata and Nearest Reversioner in Hindu Law: Insights from Mst. Sudehaiya Kunwar v. Ram Dass Pandey Introduction The case of Mst. Sudehaiya Kunwar v. Ram Dass Pandey adjudicated by the...
State Authority to Impose Retrospective Cess on Sugarcane Entry Upheld: Insights from Kunwar Murli Manohar v. State of Uttar Pradesh

State Authority to Impose Retrospective Cess on Sugarcane Entry Upheld: Insights from Kunwar Murli Manohar v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Date: Oct 30, 1956
State Authority to Impose Retrospective Cess on Sugarcane Entry Upheld: Insights from Kunwar Murli Manohar v. State of Uttar Pradesh Introduction Kunwar Murli Manohar v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And...
Land Acquisition Without Compensation: Invalidation of Provisions in the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act

Land Acquisition Without Compensation: Invalidation of Provisions in the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act

Date: Oct 9, 1956
Land Acquisition Without Compensation: Invalidation of Provisions in the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act Introduction The landmark case of Ch. Mukhtar Singh v. State Of U.P., adjudicated by the...
An Employer's Special Contribution Under ESI Act Deemed a Tax: Bindal v. ESI Corporation

An Employer's Special Contribution Under ESI Act Deemed a Tax: Bindal v. ESI Corporation

Date: Oct 6, 1956
An Employer's Special Contribution Under ESI Act Deemed a Tax: Bindal v. ESI Corporation Introduction Anand Kumar Bindal v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation And Others is a landmark judgment...
Validity of Detention Without Proper Legal Procedure: Shravan Kumar Gupta v. Superintendent District Jail

Validity of Detention Without Proper Legal Procedure: Shravan Kumar Gupta v. Superintendent District Jail

Date: Sep 13, 1956
Validity of Detention Without Proper Legal Procedure: Shravan Kumar Gupta v. Superintendent District Jail Introduction The case of Shravan Kumar Gupta v. Superintendent District Jail was adjudicated...
Strict Compliance with Section 34 of the Arbitration Act: Union Of India v. Hans Raj Gupta And Co.

Strict Compliance with Section 34 of the Arbitration Act: Union Of India v. Hans Raj Gupta And Co.

Date: Aug 31, 1956
Strict Compliance with Section 34 of the Arbitration Act: Union Of India v. Hans Raj Gupta And Co. Introduction Union Of India v. Hans Raj Gupta And Co. is a seminal judgment delivered by the...
Time Limitations on Sec. 18 Applications in Land Acquisition: Raja Harish Chandra Raj Singh v. Deputy Land Acquisition Officer

Time Limitations on Sec. 18 Applications in Land Acquisition: Raja Harish Chandra Raj Singh v. Deputy Land Acquisition Officer

Date: Aug 8, 1956
Time Limitations on Sec. 18 Applications in Land Acquisition Introduction The case of Raja Harish Chandra Raj Singh Petitioners v. Deputy Land Acquisition Officer And Another adjudicated by the...
Ajodhya Pd. Bhargava v. Bhawani Shankar Bhargava: Establishing the Boundaries between Admissions and Witness Confrontation under the Indian Evidence Act

Ajodhya Pd. Bhargava v. Bhawani Shankar Bhargava: Establishing the Boundaries between Admissions and Witness Confrontation under the Indian Evidence Act

Date: May 9, 1956
Ajodhya Pd. Bhargava v. Bhawani Shankar Bhargava: Establishing the Boundaries between Admissions and Witness Confrontation under the Indian Evidence Act Introduction The case of Ajodhya Pd. Bhargava...
Right to Withdraw Resignation Before Acceptance: Bahori Lal Paliwal v. District Magistrate

Right to Withdraw Resignation Before Acceptance: Bahori Lal Paliwal v. District Magistrate

Date: May 9, 1956
Right to Withdraw Resignation Before Acceptance: Bahori Lal Paliwal v. District Magistrate Introduction Bahori Lal Paliwal v. District Magistrate is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad...
Jogendra Raj Kishore v. University of Allahabad: Clarifying Judicial Review in University Disciplinary Actions

Jogendra Raj Kishore v. University of Allahabad: Clarifying Judicial Review in University Disciplinary Actions

Date: Apr 26, 1956
Jogendra Raj Kishore v. University of Allahabad: Clarifying Judicial Review in University Disciplinary Actions Introduction Jogendra Raj Kishore v. University of Allahabad is a significant judgment...
Landlord Rights and Execution of Company Court Decrees under Sec. 171 of the Companies Act: Shri Rameshwar Nath v. The U.P Union Bank Ltd.

Landlord Rights and Execution of Company Court Decrees under Sec. 171 of the Companies Act: Shri Rameshwar Nath v. The U.P Union Bank Ltd.

Date: Apr 18, 1956
Landlord Rights and Execution of Company Court Decrees under Sec. 171 of the Companies Act: Shri Rameshwar Nath v. The U.P Union Bank Ltd. Introduction The case of Shri Rameshwar Nath v. The U.P...
Proper Valuation of Stocks Essential for Accurate Income Tax Assessment: Insights from Chhaoni Lal Pragdas v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Proper Valuation of Stocks Essential for Accurate Income Tax Assessment: Insights from Chhaoni Lal Pragdas v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Apr 12, 1956
Proper Valuation of Stocks Essential for Accurate Income Tax Assessment: Insights from Chhaoni Lal Pragdas v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Chhaoni Lal Pragdas v. Commissioner...
Right to be Heard in Administrative Penalties: Ghanshyam Das Gupta v. Board of High School and Intermediate Education

Right to be Heard in Administrative Penalties: Ghanshyam Das Gupta v. Board of High School and Intermediate Education

Date: Mar 24, 1956
Right to be Heard in Administrative Penalties: Ghanshyam Das Gupta v. Board of High School and Intermediate Education Introduction Ghanshyam Das Gupta v. Board Of High School And Intermediate...
Vindhyachal Tewari v. Board Of Revenue: Clarifying the Applicability of Section 144, C.P.C in Post-Abolition Land Reforms

Vindhyachal Tewari v. Board Of Revenue: Clarifying the Applicability of Section 144, C.P.C in Post-Abolition Land Reforms

Date: Mar 7, 1956
Vindhyachal Tewari v. Board Of Revenue: Clarifying the Applicability of Section 144, C.P.C in Post-Abolition Land Reforms Introduction The case of Vindhyachal Tewari v. Board Of Revenue adjudicated...
Interpreting 'Final Order' under Article 133: Mahraj Kumar Mohd. Mahmood Hasan Khan v. Government of Uttar Pradesh

Interpreting 'Final Order' under Article 133: Mahraj Kumar Mohd. Mahmood Hasan Khan v. Government of Uttar Pradesh

Date: Mar 1, 1956
Interpreting 'Final Order' under Article 133: Mahraj Kumar Mohd. Mahmood Hasan Khan v. Government of Uttar Pradesh Introduction The case of Mahraj Kumar Mohd. Mahmood Hasan Khan v. Government Of...
Establishing the Nature of Trees as Movable or Immovable Property: Insights from District Board Banaras v. Pt. Ghurhu Rai

Establishing the Nature of Trees as Movable or Immovable Property: Insights from District Board Banaras v. Pt. Ghurhu Rai

Date: Feb 28, 1956
Establishing the Nature of Trees as Movable or Immovable Property: Insights from District Board Banaras v. Pt. Ghurhu Rai Introduction The case of District Board Banaras v. Pt. Ghurhu Rai adjudicated...
Defining Retrenchment vs. Business Closure: J.K. Hosiery Factory Case Analysis

Defining Retrenchment vs. Business Closure: J.K. Hosiery Factory Case Analysis

Date: Feb 25, 1956
Defining Retrenchment vs. Business Closure: J.K. Hosiery Factory Case Analysis Introduction The case of J.K. Hosiery Factory v. Labour Appellate Tribunal Of India And Another was adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert