Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Affidavit Swearing Requirements under Section 145 Cr PC: Allahabad High Court's Interpretation in Wahid v. State

Affidavit Swearing Requirements under Section 145 Cr PC: Allahabad High Court's Interpretation in Wahid v. State

Date: Feb 23, 1962
Affidavit Swearing Requirements under Section 145 Cr PC: Allahabad High Court's Interpretation in Wahid v. State Introduction The case of Wahid v. State adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Criteria for Restoration of Dismissed Suits Due to Plaintiff's Absence: Analysis of Juggi Lal Kamla Pat v. Ram Janki Gupta

Criteria for Restoration of Dismissed Suits Due to Plaintiff's Absence: Analysis of Juggi Lal Kamla Pat v. Ram Janki Gupta

Date: Feb 15, 1962
Criteria for Restoration of Dismissed Suits Due to Plaintiff's Absence: Analysis of Juggi Lal Kamla Pat v. Ram Janki Gupta And Another Introduction The case of Juggi Lal Kamla Pat, Kanpur v. Ram...
Life Insurance Corporation Of India v. Hari Das Mundhra: Landmark Judgment on Director Misconduct and Corporate Governance

Life Insurance Corporation Of India v. Hari Das Mundhra: Landmark Judgment on Director Misconduct and Corporate Governance

Date: Feb 15, 1962
Life Insurance Corporation Of India v. Hari Das Mundhra: Landmark Judgment on Director Misconduct and Corporate Governance Introduction The case of Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Hari Das...
Clarification on Deductibility of Commission Payments under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Income Tax Act: Raja Ram Kumar Bhargava v. C.I.T.

Clarification on Deductibility of Commission Payments under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Income Tax Act: Raja Ram Kumar Bhargava v. C.I.T.

Date: Feb 2, 1962
Clarification on Deductibility of Commission Payments under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Income Tax Act: Raja Ram Kumar Bhargava v. C.I.T. 1. Introduction The case of Raja Ram Kumar Bhargava v....
Non-Automatic Confirmation of Probationary Officers and Compliance with Article 311: State of Uttar Pradesh v. Akbar Ali Khan

Non-Automatic Confirmation of Probationary Officers and Compliance with Article 311: State of Uttar Pradesh v. Akbar Ali Khan

Date: Jan 24, 1962
Non-Automatic Confirmation of Probationary Officers and Compliance with Article 311: State of Uttar Pradesh v. Akbar Ali Khan Introduction The case of State of Uttar Pradesh v. Akbar Ali Khan ([1962]...
Zahir Ahmad v. Ganga Prasad: Mandatory Compliance with Cr.P.C. Sections 112 & 114 in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Zahir Ahmad v. Ganga Prasad: Mandatory Compliance with Cr.P.C. Sections 112 & 114 in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Jan 23, 1962
Zahir Ahmad v. Ganga Prasad: Mandatory Compliance with Cr.P.C. Sections 112 & 114 in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction The case of Zahir Ahmad v. Ganga Prasad, A.S.D.M, Ballia And Another...
Ram Autar Pandey v. State of U.P.: Upholding Governor's Authority to Alter Superannuation Age Retrospectively

Ram Autar Pandey v. State of U.P.: Upholding Governor's Authority to Alter Superannuation Age Retrospectively

Date: Dec 22, 1961
Ram Autar Pandey v. State of U.P.: Upholding Governor's Authority to Alter Superannuation Age Retrospectively Introduction Case Title: Ram Autar Pandey v. State of U.P. and another Court: Allahabad...
Retrospective Rule-Making Power of the Governor: Ram Autar Pandey v. State Of Uttar Pradesh (1961)

Retrospective Rule-Making Power of the Governor: Ram Autar Pandey v. State Of Uttar Pradesh (1961)

Date: Dec 22, 1961
Retrospective Rule-Making Power of the Governor: Ram Autar Pandey v. State Of Uttar Pradesh (1961) Introduction Ram Autar Pandey v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another Opposite Parties is a landmark...
Allahabad High Court's Decision on Referring Sirdari Issues under U.P Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act

Allahabad High Court's Decision on Referring Sirdari Issues under U.P Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act

Date: Nov 22, 1961
Allahabad High Court's Decision on Referring Sirdari Issues under U.P Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act Introduction The case of Ram Chandra Plaintiff versus Muneshwar and Others Defendants...
Sarjudei v. Rampati Kunwari: High Court’s Authority to Transfer Appeals Under Section 24, C.P.C.

Sarjudei v. Rampati Kunwari: High Court’s Authority to Transfer Appeals Under Section 24, C.P.C.

Date: Nov 15, 1961
Sarjudei v. Rampati Kunwari: High Court’s Authority to Transfer Appeals Under Section 24, C.P.C. Introduction Sarjudei v. Rampati Kunwari is a significant judgment delivered by the Allahabad High...
Succession Certificate in Insurance Claims: Insights from Kesari Devi v. Dharma Devi

Succession Certificate in Insurance Claims: Insights from Kesari Devi v. Dharma Devi

Date: Oct 31, 1961
Succession Certificate in Insurance Claims: Insights from Kesari Devi v. Dharma Devi Introduction The case of Kesari Devi v. Dharma Devi adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on October 30, 1961,...
Affirmation of Landlord-Tenant Relationship Over Adverse Possession in Ram Nath v. Neta

Affirmation of Landlord-Tenant Relationship Over Adverse Possession in Ram Nath v. Neta

Date: Oct 26, 1961
Affirmation of Landlord-Tenant Relationship Over Adverse Possession in Ram Nath And Others v. Neta 1. Introduction The case of Ram Nath And Others v. Neta, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Reasonable Time Principle in Penalty Proceedings: Mohd. Atiq v. Income-Tax Officer

Reasonable Time Principle in Penalty Proceedings: Mohd. Atiq v. Income-Tax Officer

Date: Oct 4, 1961
Reasonable Time Principle in Penalty Proceedings: Mohd. Atiq v. Income-Tax Officer Introduction The case of Mohd. Atiq v. Income-Tax Officer adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on October 3,...
Jaswant Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Presiding Officer: Authority of Bilingual Notifications in Industrial Law

Jaswant Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Presiding Officer: Authority of Bilingual Notifications in Industrial Law

Date: Sep 20, 1961
Authority of Bilingual Notifications in Industrial Law Introduction The case of Jaswant Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal (III) U.P And Others adjudicated by the Allahabad...
Raja Himanshu Dhar Singh v. Additional Registrar: Upholding Rule-Made Rights and Meeting Validity under the Co-operative Societies Act

Raja Himanshu Dhar Singh v. Additional Registrar: Upholding Rule-Made Rights and Meeting Validity under the Co-operative Societies Act

Date: Sep 13, 1961
Raja Himanshu Dhar Singh v. Additional Registrar: Upholding Rule-Made Rights and Meeting Validity under the Co-operative Societies Act Introduction The case of Raja Himanshu Dhar Singh v. Additional...
Disqualification of University Officers in State Legislative Elections: Upadhya v. Bhatnagar

Disqualification of University Officers in State Legislative Elections: Upadhya v. Bhatnagar

Date: Sep 8, 1961
Disqualification of University Officers in State Legislative Elections: Upadhya v. Bhatnagar Introduction The case of Joti Prasad Upadhya v. Kalka Prasad Bhatnagar and Others adjudicated by the...
Necessity of Proper Party Inclusion in Mortgage Enforcement Against Insolvent Mortgagors: Kripa Nath v. Ganga Prasad

Necessity of Proper Party Inclusion in Mortgage Enforcement Against Insolvent Mortgagors: Kripa Nath v. Ganga Prasad

Date: Aug 24, 1961
Necessity of Proper Party Inclusion in Mortgage Enforcement Against Insolvent Mortgagors: Kripa Nath v. Ganga Prasad Introduction Kripa Nath and Another v. Ganga Prasad and Others is a seminal case...
Requirement for Particularity in Land Acquisition Notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act: Ram Sewak v. State of U.P

Requirement for Particularity in Land Acquisition Notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act: Ram Sewak v. State of U.P

Date: Aug 10, 1961
Requirement for Particularity in Land Acquisition Notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act: Ram Sewak v. State of U.P Introduction The case of Ram Sewak v. State of Uttar...
Limitation Periods in Misfeasance Proceedings under Section 235 of the Companies Act: Insights from Jwala Prasad v. Official Liquidator Jwala Bank Ltd.

Limitation Periods in Misfeasance Proceedings under Section 235 of the Companies Act: Insights from Jwala Prasad v. Official Liquidator Jwala Bank Ltd.

Date: Aug 9, 1961
Limitation Periods in Misfeasance Proceedings under Section 235 of the Companies Act: Insights from Jwala Prasad v. Official Liquidator Jwala Bank Ltd. Introduction The case of Jwala Prasad v....
Jurisdictional Precedence Between Civil Injunctions and Criminal Orders: Insights from Mirza Mohd. Aziz v. Safdar Husain

Jurisdictional Precedence Between Civil Injunctions and Criminal Orders: Insights from Mirza Mohd. Aziz v. Safdar Husain

Date: Jul 29, 1961
Jurisdictional Precedence Between Civil Injunctions and Criminal Orders: Insights from Mirza Mohd. Aziz v. Safdar Husain Introduction The case of Mirza Mohd. Aziz v. Safdar Husain adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert