Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
(a) If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to such opinions or inferences as the judge finds:
(1) Are rationally based on the perception o f the witness;
(2) are helpful to a clearer understanding of the testimony of the witness; and
(3) are not based on scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge within the scope of subsection (b).
(b) If scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise if:
(1) The testimony is based on sufficient facts or data;
(2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and
(3) the witness has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.
(c) Unless the judge excludes the testimony, the judge shall be deemed to have made the finding requisite to its admission.
(d) Testimony in the form of opinions or inferences otherwise admissible under this article is not objectionable because it embraces the ultimate issue or issues to be decided by the trier of the fact.
K.S.A. 60-456
Amended by L. 2014, ch. 84,§ 2, eff. 7/1/2014.
L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-456; Jan. 1, 1964.
