Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Cal. Welf. and Inst. Code § 362.1 : CALIFORNIA WELFARE AND INSTITUTIONS CODE — CHILDREN — DELINQUENTS AND WARDS OF THE JUVENILE COURT — JUVENILE COURT LAW — DEPENDENT CHILDREN-JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS — Visitation between parent or guardian and child
(a) In order to maintain ties between the parent or guardian and any siblings and the child, and to provide information relevant to deciding if, and when, to return a child to the custody of his or her parent or guardian, or to encourage or suspend sibling interaction, any order placing a child in foster care, and ordering reunification services, shall provide as follows:
(1)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), for visitation between the parent or guardian and the child. Visitation shall be as frequent as possible, consistent with the well-being of the child.
(B) No visitation order shall jeopardize the safety of the child. To protect the safety of the child, the court may keep the child's address confidential. If the parent of the child has been convicted of murder in the first degree, as defined in Section 189 of the Penal Code, and the victim of the murder was the other parent of the child, the court shall order visitation between the child and the parent only if that order would be consistent with Section 3030 of the Family Code.
(2) Pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section
16002, for visitation between the child and any siblings, unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that sibling interaction is contrary to the safety or well-being of either child.
(3) Pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section
16002, for review of the reasons for any suspension of sibling interaction at each periodic review hearing pursuant to Section
366, and for a requirement that, in order for a suspension to continue, the court shall make a renewed finding that sibling interaction is contrary to the safety or well-being of either child.
(4) If the child is a teen parent who has custody of his or her child and that child is not a dependent of the court pursuant to this chapter, for visitation among the teen parent, the child's noncustodial parent, and appropriate family members, unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that visitation would be detrimental to the teen parent.
(b) When reunification services are not ordered pursuant to Section
361.5, the child's plan for legal permanency shall include consideration of the existence of and the relationship with any sibling pursuant to Section
16002, including their impact on placement and visitation.
(c) As used in this section, "sibling" means a person related to the identified child by blood, adoption, or affinity through a common legal or biological parent.
Ca. Welf. and Inst. Code § 362.1
Amended by Stats 2015 ch 425 (SB 794),s 8, eff. 1/1/2016.
Amended by Stats 2014 ch 773 (SB 1099),s 3, eff. 1/1/2015.
Amended by Stats 2010 ch 560 (AB 743),s 1, eff. 1/1/2011.
Amended by Stats 2005 ch 630 (SB 500),s 2, eff. 1/1/2006
Amended by Stats 2000 ch 909 (AB 1987), s 3, eff. 1/1/2001.