...prolonging treatment as shown by such English authority as there is: see In re B. (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment) [1981] 1 W.L.R. 1421, 1424B–G; In re C....-General [1981] A.C. 718; In re B. (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation) [1988] A.C. 199; Buck v. Bell (1927) 274 U.S. 200..., or a therapeutic sterilisation: In re E. (A Minor) (Medical Treatment) [1991] 2 F.L.R. 585; In re G.F. (Medical Treatment) [1992] 1 F.L.R. 293.) The reasons for...

...upbringing of children. If a person having a recognisable interest brings such a dispute to the court, the court must decide it. There are abundant examples of this happening. One such case is In Re B (...the parents' refusal. This is trite law. In In Re B. (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation) [1988] A.C. 199, 202 Lord Hailsham of St. Marylebone L.C. said:- "There is no doubt that, in...of life "which as a test in itself raises as many questions as it can answer" I judged the quality of her life to be demonstrably awful and intolerable following In Re B. In Re J. (A Minor) (Wards...

...with medical practice, the responsibility for the decision rests with the doctors; the medical duty is the test.(g) He referred to In re. B. (a minor) (Wardship Medical Treatment) [...this jurisdiction, the first and paramount consideration is the well-being, welfare or interests of the ward. 168. As stated by Lord Hailsham L.C. in Re B. (A Minor) (Wardship...and minor matters which - (a) was formerly exercised by the Lord Chancellor of Ireland, (b) was, at the passing of the Act of 1924, exercised by the Lord Chief Justice of Ireland, and (c...

...Parliamentary Archives,HL/PO/JU/18/255 P1 and others (minors) (A.P.) (Appellants) v. BedfordshireCounty council (Respondents)In re M (a minor) (1994) (A.P....) and another (A.P.) (Appellant)In re E (a minor) (1994) (A.P.) (Respondent)Christmas (A.P.) (Respondent) v. Hampshire County Council(Appellants)Keating...BedfordshireCounty Council, In re M (a minor) (1994) and another, In re E (aminor) (1994), Christmas against Hampshire County Council andKeating against Mayor etc. of the London Borough of Bromley, Thatthe...

...have been made recently regarding proof of allegations of sexual abuse of children: see In re G (A Minor) (Child Abuse: Standards of Proof) [1987] 1 W.L.R 1461,1466, and In re W..., in In re G (A Minor) ( Child Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1987] 1 W.L.R. 1461,1466, and In re W (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1994] 1 F.L.R. 419.... [1993] 1 F.L.R. 281, rejected an argument that "likely to suffer significant harm" was to be equated with "on the balance of probabilities". In In re A (A Minor) (Care...

...the business; "(b) 'transferee' means any natural or legal person who, byreason of a transfer within the meaning of article 1(1),becomes the employer in respect of the undertaking...the reported cases in the UnitedKingdom. In Alphafield Ltd, (trading as Apex Leisure Hire) v.Barratt [1984] 1 W.L.R. 1062, the receiver of an undertaking,having negotiated a transfer...- "immediately before the transfer." After a careful analysis of thecases, the Court of Appeal rejected the approach of theEmployment Appeal Tribunal in Apex [1984] 1 W.L.R. 1062 andAnchor...

.... Mustadand Son v. Dosen [1964] 1 W.L.R. 109. The courts have, however,so far refused to extend this principle where the confidentialinformation is published by a third party...confidant: see Speed SealProducts Ltd, v. Paddington [1985] 1 W.L.R. 1327. The duty of confidence is, as a general rule, also imposedon a third party who is in.... Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd.[1984] 1 W.L.R. 892). A classic example of a case where limiteddisclosure is required is a case of alleged iniquity in the SecurityServices. Here there...

...giving some examples of when a court might backdate an order, Sir David Cairns in Covell Matthews & Partners v. French Wools Ltd. [1978] 1 W.L.R. 1477, 1487, gave a money judgment...loan: compare Wadsworth v. Lydall [1981] 1 W.L.R. 598. An award of interest under the statute from the earlier date would therefore be double counting. On...of claims for loss which is purely financial (or economic, as it is sometimes described). In Forster v. Outred & Co. [1982] 1 W.L.R. 86, 94, Stephenson L.J. recorded the...

...Hall & Co. Ltd. v. Shoreham-by-Sea Urban District Council [1964] 1 W.L.R. 240. The plaintiffs wanted to build a ready mixed...Council [1964] 1 W.L.R. 240 would have regarded as Wednesbury unreasonable in a condition. A good example of its application is the recent case of Reg. ...Council [1994] 1 W.L.R. 376, the only tests for the validity of a planning obligation outside the express terms of section 106 are that it must be for a planning purpose and not...

....(4th) 1. This extreme position was rejected by this House In re B.(A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation) [1988] A.C. 199 which recognisedthat an operation might be in the best...comparable to F.'s, in In Re B. (A Minor)(Wardship: Sterilisation) [1988] A.C. 199. The answer to the firstquestion would have been that, because of the seriousness ofdeciding whether the...person upon whom it is proposed toperform the operation. This approach is consistent with theopinion expressed by Lord Templeman in In re B (A Minor)(Wardship: Sterilisation) [1988] A.C...

...) of the 1962 Act re-enacted in paragraph 1(b) of Schedule 5 to the 1980 Act. Shabpar alleges that in his case the L.E.A., having refused him a mandatory award, failed to consider whether he should...rely on his unlawful residence as constituting ordinary residence (even though in a tax case the Crown may be able to do so): In re Abdul Manan [1971] 1 W.L.R. 859, and Reg. v...attached importance to the purpose or reason for a person's presence in the United Kingdom: Reg. v. Barnet B. C. [1981] 2 W.L.R. 86. In their view, there must be shown an intention to...

..., calledBerthlwyd and Pantdwfn. They sell milk wholesale to the MilkMarketing Board. The present case is concerned only withPantdwfn. As from 1 April 1984, the sale of milk wholesalebecame subject to a...refusal of substantiverelief. On 26 May 1989 the Court of Appeal dismissed theirappeal, the sole judgment being delivered by Lloyd L.J., withwhom Kerr and Butler-Sloss L.JJ. agreed [1989] 1 W.L.R.... Stratford-on-AvonDistrict Council, Ex parte Jackson [1985] 1 W.L.R. 1319, in whichit was held that those words must be read as referring to anapplication for leave to apply for judicial...

...Lance & Co. [1988] 1 W.L.R. 881. As I have said, the scope of the solicitor's duties to his client are setby the terms of his retainer; and as a result it...plaintiffs' claim in the present casewould in substance, in my opinion, be to give them the benefit of a contractto which they were not parties. - 1 - Further there is, in...Mr.Jones did not keep them. Then on 16 August he dictated an internalmemorandum to a member of the firm's probate department, whichread: 'Re: Arthur Thomas Barrett [sic] - New Will. Keith...

...[1981] 1 W.L.R. 598, I should have thought that a strong, ifnot an overwhelming, case would have been made out for yourLordships' House, in order to do justice to creditors in all...this field to which I havereferred, and since the scope of the London, Chatham and DoverRailway case has been qualified to a significant extent by Wadsworthv. Lydall [1981] 1 W.L.R. 598...recoverable under a resulting trust:Birch v. Blagrave (1755) Amb. 264: Childers v. Childers (1875) 1 De G. &J. 482: In re Vinogradoff [l935] W.N. 68: In re Muller [1953] N.Z.L.R...

...facts (a) that it was made in the exercise of a power conferred under the royal prerogative and not by statute, and (b) that it concerned national security. It is...servants generally, and not about local problems at GCHQ. In 1981 especially it was part of a campaign by the national trade unions, designed to do as much damage as possible to government agencies.... One of these is a circular letter dated 10 March 1981 from the Society of Civil and Public Servants. In a paragraph headed “Selective Strikes” the letter states as follows: “Union members at certain...

...[1978] 1 W.L.R. 1, which was decided in July 1977, a fewmonths before Ord. 53 came into force (as it did in December1977). I find it impossible to accept that the right to...landlords were the London Borough of Wandsworth,the appellants. On 2 March 1981, the appellants gave notice tothe respondent under section 40(1), (4) of the Act of 1980 that,with effect from 6 April 1981...histenancy was £12.06 per week. The action has caused a considerable divergence of judicialopinion so far. The appellants applied to strike out the paragraphs - 1...

...honest comment on a matter of public interest, then, does not cover defamatory statements of fact. But there are circumstances, in the famous words of Parke B. in Toogood v. Spyring (1834) 1 C.M...regarded as a classic direction on fair comment to the jury Diplock J. in Silkin v. Beaverbrook Newspapers Ltd. [1958] 1. W.L.R. 743, 746.... United Kingdom 22 EHRR 123. See also Maxwell v. Pressdram Ltd. [1987] 1 W.L.R. 298 for a vivid illustration of this uncertainty...

...Interpretation: a Code" 3rd ed. 1997 at p. 686 and Halsbury's Laws (4th ed. Re-issue) (1995) vol. 44(1), para. 1473. If "family" could only mean a legal relationship (of blood or by legal ceremony of...of the word is to be taken; "family" where it is used in the Rent Acts is not a term of art (per Lord Diplock in Carrega Properties S.A. v. Sharratt [1979] 1 W.L.R...personal relationship. Russell L.J., with whose speech Lord Diplock in Carrega [1979] 1 W.L.R. 928, 931 agreed said, at p. 432: "Granted that 'family' is not limited to cases of a strict...

.... Chinn v. Hochstrasser [1981]...knownprinciple of I.R.C. v. Duke of Westminster [1936] AC 1. This is a cardinalprinciple but it must not be overstated or overextended. While obliging thecourt...taxpayer, by written offer and oralacceptance, on 23rd February, 1973 to one of the intra schemecompanies Caithmead Ltd. The terms are important and must be setout. They were: (a) L.1...

...September 1995, the respondent applied to strike out the claim pursuant to Ord. 13, r. 5(1)(a) of the County Court Rules 1981 on the ground that it disclosed no reasonable cause of action. That...case (a) that the authority had failed to perform carefully the duty imposed on it by the Education Act 1981; (b) that the authority...school are under a duty to safeguard the physical well being of the pupil: Van Oppen v. Clerk to the Bedford Charity Trustees [1990] 1 W.L.R. 235." Although there was no previous case...