Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STAFFORD et al. v. LICK et al. [*]

         JUDGES: Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Field, J., and Burnett, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          TERRY, Judge

         This is an act of ejectment, for a lot in San Francisco.

         Both parties deraign title from the same source, defendants claiming under a paper executed on the 6th of October, 1846, which is in the following words:

         " By this present, I give ample and sufficient power to Don Jose de Jesus Noe to use or dispose of my lot, which I hold (or have) granted, as may seem best to him; and, in testimony, I give the present power, in the place of Yerba Buena, the 6th day of October, 1846.

         Maximo Z. Fernandez."

         And the main question raised by the record is, whether this paper is a sufficient conveyance.

         In Hayes v. Bona, (7 Cal. 158,) we held that contracts for the sale of land were, under the Mexican law, and by the custom of California, required to be in writing, " and although the forms prescribed were not strictly followed, still it was necessary that the instrument should contain at least the names of the parties, the thing sold, the date of the transfer, and the price paid."

         This view is decisive of this case, and on the authority of the opinion in Hayes v. Bona, the judgment of the Court below is reversed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Stafford v. Lick
(Jul 1, 1858)