Inasmuch as defendant failed to withdraw his plea of guilty or move to vacate the judgment, he has failed to preserve for our review the validity of his plea ( see, People v. Hayes, 241 A.D.2d 627). In any event, were we to consider defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his plea of guilty, we would find it to be without merit. There is no requirement that a defendant personally recite the elements of the crime to which he or she is pleading ( see, People v. Kinch, 237 A.D.2d 830). Our review of the record reveals that defendant's affirmative response to County Court's inquiries during the plea allocution establishes that he entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent guilty plea to the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree ( see, People v. Williams, 219 A.D.2d 864, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 855).
Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.