CiteTEXT
...rather than a process patent goes back as far as Parke-Davis & Co. v. H K Mulford & Co 189 F 95 (CCSDNY 1911) when Learned Hand upheld a product...549 "Mölnlycke") or a corkscrew (see Hallen Co v Brabantia (UK) Ltd [1991] RPC 195) or as complex as an "heavier-than...to seek to obtain protection, not for a single compound, but for a class of compounds, and sometimes an almost unimaginably large class (see for instance Pharmacia Corp v Merck & Co...
...[1978] ILRM 208, Re Parke Davis & Co. Trademark Application [1976] FSR 195). These cases demonstrate that Celtic was correct to abandon, for the purposes of...United States Cable Co. v. Anglo-American Telegraph Co. (1877) 2 App. Cas. 394].” In a concurring judgment, Denham J. said at p. 1...
...countries should be complied with by the Controller when granting licences under the 1964 Act. See Parke Davis & Co v Comptroller of Patents, Designs and Trademarks [1954] AC 321 where...
...goods must look to the consignor or consignee". In Parke, Davis & Co. v. B.O.A.C. (1958) US and Can. Av. Rep. 122 (New York State City Court), the Manhattan and...held that the real party at interest has standing to sue although not the consignee named in the air waybill. (Parke, Davis & Co. v. BOAC ....). 66. In...of the customs broker there appears "a/c Parke, Davis & Company, Detroit, Michigan". Further, due to the necessity of having the shipment passed by U.S. Customs and U.S. Public Health Service, it was...
...Prohibition". [24] An intellectual property right did not automatically confer a dominant position on the proprietor despite its exclusionary effect: Parke, Davis & Co. v...all the products or services forming part of the same market in so far as a specific use of such products or services is concerned": F Hoffmann-La Roche & Co AG 13 v Commission of the...plc v Purvis 1990 SLT 262 at 265-266; Ellis v Lochgelly Iron and Coal Co 1909 SC 1278 at 1282. [37] A further attempt was made...
.... Finally there is a trade mark licence treated as coming into effect on 17 April 2012 between Pfizer Ltd, Parke Davis & Co LLC (an affiliated company with Pfizer Ltd) and Flynn Pharma. Under this...agreement, Parke Davis, as owner of the UK trade mark EPANUTIN grants Flynn Pharma the right to use the name 'Epanutin' in the identicode on the capsule shell. However, Flynn Pharma is not permitted to use...
...-Lambert’s Parke-Davis subsidiary. (Parke-Davis was acquired by Warner-Lambert in 1970 and Warner-Lambert was acquired by Pfizer in 2000.) The parties 8. Actavis PTC and Actavis UK are...being informed of the data in Mellick, and his subsequent involvement in the Parke-Davis Gabapentin Advisory Board. 24. Warner-Lambert adduced factual evidence from Dr Berkeley...-convulsant and had been licensed for such use in the UK in February and the USA in December 1993. It was marketed by Parke-Davis under the trade mark Neurontin. The mechanism of action of gabapentin was...
...is not covered by the deposit. 6. As before the recorder, Mr and Mrs Hooper were represented before us by Mr Philip Flower of Counsel, and Mr Oates by Mr Nicolas Davis, solicitor...analysis, his order assumes the hearing date rather than the earlier valuation date. Discussion17. Mr Davis took as his starting point this proposition in paragraph 22-034.... He was awarded some consequential loss as damages but asserted that he should be awarded the whole price as well. The court (Baron Parke, the other members of the court agreeing) held that he was...
...in the Netherlands, France and Germany in which foreign sellers had been held liable for patent infringement. In Probel v Parke Davis...
...is a fundamental principle of the English law of landlord and tenant. In Hart v. Windsor (1844) 12 M. & W. 68, 87 Parke B. said: "There is no contract, still less a condition, implied by law on the...comfort of persons using the demised premises recalls a similar distinction made by Lord Westbury L.C. for the purposes of the law of nuisance in St. Helen's Smelting Co. v. Tipping (1865) 11 HLCas...Lyttelton Times Co. Ltd. v. Warners Ltd [1907] AC 476. The plaintiffs owned a hotel in Christchur...
...that without the co-operation of Norwich Union he could not possibly have repaid it, but Norwich Union has accepted in open correspondence with Scottish Equitable (copied to Mr Derby's solicitors) that...disentitles the party from recovering, must mean a knowledge existing in the mind at the time of payment."21. Parke B agreed and set out his view in a much-quoted passage...-9, including Meeme Mutual Home Protection Fire Insurance Co v Lorfeld (1927) 194 Wis 322). But deliberate waiver of inquiry or...
...succeeded in setting off damages for failure to meet the contractual specification in an action against him for the contract price. Parke B spoke differentially of loss in market value and "any...Ltd (1997) 87 BLR 26, where, adopting earlier decisions in Oastler v Pound (1863) LT(NS) 852 and Davis v...judgment of this court delivered by Sir Raymond Evershed MR in George Cohen, Sons and Co Ltd v Docks and Inland Waterways Executive (1950) 84 Ll LR 97. 13. This is...
.... The Official Referee regarded the principle laid down in Dakin & Co., Ltd. v. Lee, (1916, 1 King's Bench, page 566) as applicable. The contract in that case was...certain observations out of their context. In Broom v. Davis (7 East, page 481) Mr Justice Buller decided that where a man had contracted to build a booth for.... Steel (8 Meeson and Welsby, page 858) the issue was procedural, but in a passage often cited Baron Parke deals with contracts "for an agreed price for work which was to be done according to contract...
...) were accepted by the Court of Appeal. The head-note to Allen v. Flood(2)might well have run in words used by Parke B. in giving the judgment of an exceptionally strong Court...operated on by this mode, and ceased to deal with him; attempts were also made by means of such lists to influence two other men named Davis and Hastings. With the object of further inconveniencing Leathem...citation and discussion of which much time has been expended, for not one of them would really assist the appellant in defence of his or his co-conspirators' conduct. The Mogul Case(1...
...a puncheon of whisky while in course of carriage by sea between Leith and Newcastle. The pursuers, William Dunlop and Co., wine and spirit merchants in Edinburgh, shipped the puncheon on board a...supersedes the necessity of showing ownership in the goods; and by authority of the case of Davis v. James (5 Burr. 2680), and the latest case of Joseph v. Knox (3 Camp. 320) that the consignor is able to...and the passing of the ownership at common law, since in Scotland the risk of loss might pass before delivery, but the ownership would not pass until delivery was made (Seath & Co. v. Moore...
...analgesic. In 1990 he became Head of Pharmacology at the Parke-Davis Neuroscience Research Centre in Cambridge, again in the field of drug discovery, including research in the field of analgesia.... Expert Witnesses 26. Napp called Dr McKnight and Professors Power and Aulton. ratiopharm/Sandoz called Professors McQuay, Bennett and Davis. 27...Leeds. 33. Professor Stanley Davis is Emeritus Professor of Pharmacy at the University of Nottingham. He has held senior posts in pharmacy and pharmaceutics at the University of Aston in...
..., interrupted by a short spell as Head of Organic Synthesis at Parke Davis Neuroscience Research Centre in 1993-94. From 2001 to 2007 he was employed by Organon International as Head of Medicinal Chemistry. He continued in this role...established by evidence that the individuals had declined to co-operate with them and (ii) AstraZeneca had not established that they were resident in countries which did not have procedures for taking...Co v Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy [2013] EWHC 1737 (Pat) at [12]-[42], which Dr Hill referred to in his first report...
...CASE NO: CO/2064/2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEENS BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT ROYAL COURTS OF...Davis v Lisle [1936] 2 KB 440 Goddard J, as he then was said at page 440: `I think that it cannot be denied that when you have such premises.... In Bright v Walker [1832] 1C.M.&R 211, the first reported case under the Prescription Act 1832, Baron Parke explained the purpose and operation of the Act...
...Derby & Co. Ltd v Weldon (No. 9) [1991] 1 W.L.R. 652. In my view this argument proceeds on a false basis. The former Rules of the...maintenance than improvement of the database and that for that reason alone it was not capable of supporting a lien: see Hatton v Car Maintenance Co...Scarfe v Morgan Parke B. expressed the view that particular liens "being consistent with the principles of natural equity, are favoured by the law, which is construed liberally in...
...(1833) 5 B & Ad 469, cited by Esher MR in Grand Junction Canal v Petty (1888) 21 QBD 273,275, 52 JP 692 it was said by Parke B at p478: "If the...: There is a decision in Great Central Railway Co. v. Balby with Hexthorpe Urban District Council (1912), 2 Ch. 112; 10 L. G. R. 687 ; 81 L. J. Ch. 596, and I think it must be..., and, often as they have been cited, I think I should remind your Lordships of the words of Parke J. in that case. "If," he said, "the land were vested by the Act of Parliament in commissioners, so that...