...the staff who were not of Asian origin? In any event in the light of the Gaming Board decision to remove the Applicant's green certificate we query whether he has suffered any...gaming in this country, under the Gaming Act and the Gaming Board, is undertaken pursuant to the terms of that Act. A number of qualifications are required according to the position occupied within a.... That is what Mecca found that he had done and he was dismissed. It was the duty of Mecca and Miss Welsh as its agent to report this matter to the Gaming Board. This was done and the various...

...the staff who were not of Asian origin? In any event in the light of the Gaming Board decision to remove the Applicant's green certificate we query whether he has suffered any...gaming in this country, under the Gaming Act and the Gaming Board, is undertaken pursuant to the terms of that Act. A number of qualifications are required according to the position occupied within a.... That is what Mecca found that he had done and he was dismissed. It was the duty of Mecca and Miss Welsh as its agent to report this matter to the Gaming Board. This was done and the various...

...the staff who were not of Asian origin? In any event in the light of the Gaming Board decision to remove the Applicant's green certificate we query whether he has suffered any...gaming in this country, under the Gaming Act and the Gaming Board, is undertaken pursuant to the terms of that Act. A number of qualifications are required according to the position occupied within a.... That is what Mecca found that he had done and he was dismissed. It was the duty of Mecca and Miss Welsh as its agent to report this matter to the Gaming Board. This was done and the various...

...Commissioners. It seeks a certificate to enable it to apply for a gaming licence. The Gaming Board have refused their consent. So Crockfords is faced with extinction. It applies to this Court to quash the decision of...the Board and their decision that the application did not satisfy the requirements of Paragraph 4(5) and (6) of Schedule 2 to the Gaming Act 1968 was conveyed by letter of 9 January...the Gaming Board. It says that they did not aot in accordance with the rules of natural justice. Three years ago, in 19~7, the gaming clubs in England were having a very...

...United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR 177, 187. That concerned a decision by the Gaming Board as to whether Kingsley was a fit and proper person...to hold a management position in the gaming industry. The question turned entirely upon the truth of allegations by the Board that he had been involved in various undesirable practices. After a hearing...by pre-judging his case. But the English courts said that no domestic remedy existed because the Gaming Board, including its chairman, was the only body with statutory power to decide whether he was a...

...costs be fair. If they are not, these courts will not hesitate to interfere." In that case it was not thought necessary for the Gaming Board when it made its decision to give reasons. Conversely in R v...jurisdiction of the decision making authority. As Lord Selbourne said as long ago as 1885 in Spackman v Plumstead District Board of Works [1885] 10 AC 229, 240...to persuade him to take a different view. It would be a situation to which approach to this court in R v The Gaming Board ex parte Benaim [1970] 2 QB...

...decision. The Gaming Board approved those machines under section 21 on 17 November 2003. Thomas Estates operated these at Cricklewood from late 2003. 46. Jackpot Roulette was officially...purposes of due diligence included both the Gaming Board and also Customs assurance officers the case is even stronger. We conclude that the facts necessary to found any defence of due diligence have not been established. Summary of conclusions 97. We summarise our conclusions as follows: (1) The decision of...to 5 December 2005 on income from slot machines. This decision concerns the period during which the United Kingdom was in breach of the principle of fiscal neutrality in the taxation of gaming machines...

...R v Gaming Board for Great Britain, Ex p Benaim [1970] 2 QB 417 that: 'That decision demonstrates two matters. (1...important at para. 82, by reference to the decision of the Supreme Court in R (Osborn) v Parole Board [2013] UKSC 61...June 2016 he applied for ILR as a T1GM. His claim was refused under paragraph 322 (5) on 9 June 2016. The Reasons enclosed with the decision letter relied on a discrepancy between his earnings as...

...is 20 within UK territorial waters.) 103. In Berkholz the ECJ considered a reference in relation to gaming machines on board a ferry. HMRC say the decision is obiter on the...operate gaming machines and casino on board ferries - whether separate supplies of gaming machine and casino licence or single supply of gambling provision - separate supplies...place of supply rules in relation to supply of casino licence - no fixed establishment on board ferries for purpose of place of supply in relation to gaming machine...

...you to respond to this letter. I would however reiterate my observations that all questions about registration could be removed at a stroke by registering with the Gaming Board. This is clearly an option available to the trustees. In any response please provide me with an explanation why this is not being pursued urgently. A decision not...trustees do not want Gaming Board scrutiny. Given the uniqueness of this situation, I am copying this letter not only to the Charity Commission, the Gaming Board and Mishcon De Reya but also to the Home Office which did not have a representative at the meeting. I propose to make a final decision on.... FITZGERALD appeared on behalf of the Gaming Board. ____________________HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT ____________________Crown Copyright...

...Pusher machine and then spending the accumulated proceeds as they wish. For all these reasons it may be wondered why the Gaming Board should have seen fit to challenge the decision of the Court of...the attention of the Gaming Board was that they did not require the player to exchange his plaque or soft toy after each game. He could accumulate plaques or toys or both and eventually exchange them...stipulated number of plaques or soft toys. The Gaming Board took the view that the right to exchange the plaque or toy (together with other such plaques or toys) for an item worth more than £6 gave the...

...R v Gaming Board for Great Britain, ex p. Benaim and Khaida [1970] 2 QB 417 that: "That decision demonstrates two matters. (1...reasonable".11. The expedited process, which became known as 'Operation Purnia', ultimately consisted of two phases. The first phase was an interview, decision-making and...but to the French authorities by means of a spreadsheet with a short word or phrase reasons for refusal on 14 December 2016. Most of the children were then told of the decision by the French...

...Services Limited (No E00902) at para 30, where the tribunal made the point that, although the tribunal was not bound by the views of the Gaming Board, it should not lightly dismiss the opinion of the...not provided on a gaming machine, which are subject to Item 2. He submits that this simple logic is the basis for the decision in Ulster Video Amusements and that the decision in that case is clearly...that it was based on unsound reasoning. She argued that the decision effectively re-wrote the legislation, as its effect was to imply an exception for gaming machines from the Item 2 exemption for...

...Introduction1. In these proceedings the Claimant seeks judicial review of the decision of the Horserace Betting Levy Board ("the Board") that customers of betting...decision of the Board was based on an incorrect interpretation and an incorrect application of the 1963 Act, and is therefore liable to be quashed for legal error. 2. The issue is one of...the leading betting exchange in this country. It supports the decision of the Board. 7. The Third Interested Party, the Bookmakers' Committee, is a statutory body, established pursuant...

...against that decision to this court. Gala Maybury Casino has entered the process as objectors. The application for the licence was under the Gaming Act 1968. The appeal is governed by...paragraph 18(1) could not have been the basis of the Board's decision. That sub-paragraph would apply only to the situation where there were no gaming facilities of the kind applied for, which was clearly...Reasons begins by informing the applicants that the application was refused in terms of paragraph 18(1) of Schedule 2 to the Gaming Act 1968. It contains a narrative of the proceedings before the Board...

.... In these proceedings, Mr. Freeney ("the Applicant") seeks to challenge, by way of judicial review, a decision dated 1stNovember 2021 of An Bord Pleanála ("the Board") to grant planning...comprise the process which explains how and why the Board arrived at its decision. 12. In this case, for example, the Board Direction was signed by the Board member, Dr. Maria...the Statement of Grounds at paragraph (9) (on page 5), the Applicant pleads that "[t]he Board's decision issued on 1st November 2021 and neither the Board...

..., there is a decision of the Queen's Bench Divisional Court in R.v. Lewes Justices Ex-parte The Gaming Board of Great Britain [1971] 2 All E.R. 1126 where Lord...contends that everything that happened from the decision of the Government of the 1st August, 1996 to the events of the night of the 6th and 7th November, 1996 was characterised by blunder after...now do so. 20. The first point that arises for decision is as to the jurisdiction of the Court to set aside a subpoena. In Cully v. Northern Bank...

...cause, remits the matter to the defenders to re-consider their decision of 26 June 2006 to refuse the pursuers' application for a new gaming licence relative to premises at 121/125 Fountainbridge...basis of their decision was. The Statement of Reasons begins by informing the applicants that the application was refused in terms of paragraph 18(1) of Schedule 2 to the Gaming Act...paragraph 18(2)(b) which their counsel described as critical. The ratio of the Board's decision is expressed as follows:- "In reaching their decision, the Licensing Board...

...is the proper contradictor, to rely on the analogy of appeals under the Licensing (Scotland) Act 1976 in relation to the licensing of liquor and betting and gaming. In those cases the licensing board...which had made the decision was entitled to appear at the appeal and defend its decision (section 39(2A), even though the sheriff was entitled to remit an application back to the licensing board for...reconsideration. The licensing board was also entitled to appear in any subsequent appeal to the Court of Session. That was an example of a decision-making body being permitted to appear at an appeal...

...just discussed, the respondents had taken account of the Gaming Board advice on the matter contained in 6/10 of process, in particular paragraph 68 thereof in seeking to achieve the purpose they did, though they were not bound to do so. The decision of...Petitioner; for Judicial Review of three decisions of the City of Glasgow Licensing Board dated 20June 2003 under Section32 of the Gaming Act 1968 ________________ Petitioners: Sir M. Campbell, Q.C...policies of the Licensing Board Summary of policies." At para. 14, page 10 of that document the following is stated: "Gaming Act 1968 - Policy relative to directions in terms of Section 32 - AWP...