Court Filter

Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards163176
From 2011 To 2020102094
From 2001 To 201015323
From 1991 To 20005313
From 1981 To 19901591
From 1971 To 19802140
From 1961 To 19701815
From 1951 To 19602200
Before 19505729

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...the application filed by the defendant- petitioner under Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC. Material facts necessary for disposal of this petition are that the plaintiff-r...application under Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC stating therein that the agreement dated 3.3.2009 is irrelevant and inadmissible in evidence, as the same is unregistered and insufficien...Order 24/07/2017 (BY THE COURT) The instant petition under Article 227 of the...

...find any substance in the said contention in view of Order 13, Rule 3 of CPC which made it clear that the Court is empowered to exercise the discretion and reje...documents which are considered to be inadmissible. The rejection of inadmissible documents under Order 13, Rule 3 of CPC can be at any stage of the sui...and contending that the question of admissibility of the suit promissory note in evidence did not arise at that stage. After hearing both the parties, the Court below by order dated 15-6-2009 allowed...

...a personal decree for the balance amount? 2.The revision petitioner herein took out an application under Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC for rejecting Ex.A4 which was relied upon...been filed. 2.Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3.This Court is of the view that the court below ought not to have rendered any finding on merits...order was granted in this Civil Revision Petition, the suit has already substantially progressed and that it is now posted for arguments of the defendant. He expressed his apprehension that as a...

...2013 praying the trial Court to reject the xerox copy of the document marked as Exhibit A-11 under Order 13 rule 3 of CPC.5. The petitioners’ application was dismissed by ...and final order dated 24.11.2013, made in I.A.No.643 of 2010 in O.S.No.654 of 2010 on the file of the 5th Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore.)1. The petitioners have...filed this Civil Revision Petition to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.643 of 2010 in O.S.No.654 of 2010 dated 24.11.2013 on the file of the learned V Additional District and Sessions Court...

...suit document even before the commencement of the trial.11. I do not find any substance in the said contention in view of Order 13, Rule 3 of ...13, Rule 3 of CPC can be at any stage of the suit proceedings, however the reasons for such rejection shall be recorded. In the instant case, a specific plea was raised in the written...of admissibility of the suit promissory note in evidence did not arise at that stage. After hearing both the parties, the Court below by order dated 15-6-2009 allowed I.A. No. 840 of 2008 holding that...

...has pointed out that the application preferred under Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC by the petitioners-defendants was rejected by the learned Court below. The prayer in the...Order 10/04/2018 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under articles 226 & 227 of the constitution of india with the following prayers.... Any other order or direction, which this Honble Court deemed just and proper be passed in favour of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner Shri SP Sharma...

...filed I.A. No. 173 of 2009 under Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC read with Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act to direct the respondents/plaintiffs to get the su...petitioners filed I.A. No. 769 of 2009 under Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC read with Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act to record their objection and to pass ...227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 09.09.2009 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad in I.A. No. 769 of 2009 in O.S. No. 160 of 2004. 2. I have heard Sri...

...Schedule 1-A of the Indian Stamp Act and also on the ground that the document was not registered. The revision petitioners further filed I.A. No. 173 of 2009 under Order 13 Rule ...record. When the Court did not consider the said objections and posted the suit to 29.07.2009 for cross-examination of PW. 1, the petitioners filed I.A. No. 769 of 2009 under Order 13 ...against the order dated 09.09.2009 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad in I.A. No. 769 of 2009 in O.S. No. 160 of 2004.2. I have heard Sri V. Ravikiran Rao, learned counsel...

...for respondent No.2 would vehemently contend that Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC is very clear that the Court may at any stage of the suit reject any document which it considers irrelevant or oth...is a contract or not, the same can be considered at later stage while considering the matter on merits, not at the stage of entertaining the document before the Court. No doubt, Order 13 Rule 3 of... - 3 - Additional JMFC, Ranebennur vide Annexure-E and pass such other order as this Court deems fit in the circumstances ...

..., Chennai, dated 27.02.2019, dismissing the application filed by the petitioners under Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC., to declare the authorisation letter Ex.B.1 as illegal and consequently to eschew the...below that as per Section 22(2) of the Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act, the Chairman and the Managing Director by way of General or Special order in writing can always delegate 3...of 2008, on the file of IV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai and set aside the order dated 27.2.2019. For Petitioners : Mr.G.A.Thiyagarajan For Respondents : Mr.C.Kalaichelvan...

...dated 08.01.2019 pending on the file of the Sub Court, Tiruvarur, thereby dismissed the application filed under Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC to reject the Ex.R1 and Ex.R2 as inadmissible in evi... ORDER This civil revision petition is filed as against the the judgment and decree passed in IA.No.79 of 2018 in OS.No.99 of 2018...is clear that proviso to Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act and Section 17(1)(b) of Indian Registration Act 3/6 made...

...is important to note that Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC is very clear that the Court can reject the application if any documents produced which are irrelevant and proviso is...by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM Belagavi, thereby rejecting the application under Order VIII Rule 1A read with Section 151 of CPC filed by the defendant No.1/petitioner marked as Annexure-K...separate possession and this petition is filed by the defendant No.1. The petitioner filed an application invoking Order 8 Rule 1A of CPC seeking permission to produce the documents of hand loan...

...after marking the document Exhibit- A1 without making any objection, the present application filed under order 13, rule 3 of CPC is not maintainable in law. 13...13, rule 3 of CPC is not maintainable in law. 13.In order to strengthen his contention, he has relied on the following decisions: 1...to CRP.(MD)No.606 of 2018, it was filed as against dismissal of I.A.No.52 of 2017 which was filed by the revision petitioners under Order 13, Rule 3 of C.P.C....

...District Judge No. 4, Kota dismissed the application of the petitioner-defendant filed under Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC and allowed the respondents-plaintiffs to ma...the pendency of the suit, filed an application under Order 13 Rule 3 CPC imploring the court not to allow the plaintiff to mark exhibit on the said document dated 18.2.1...BY THE COURT:By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has beseeched to quash and set-aside the order dated 9th August, 2009, whereby the learned Additional...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereby the learned Junior Civil Judge reviewed the order dated 20-8-2001 passed in I.A.No. 1111/2001 filed under Order 13 Rule 3 ...documents. These two sale deeds were marked as Exs.A-3 and A-4 through P.W.1. Later on the respondents/ defendants filed I.A.1111/2001 under Order 13 Rule 3 CPC read with Section...Order 47 Rule 1(c) and Section 151 CPC seeking review of the order dated 29-8-2001. The learned Junior Civil Judge allowed the review application and rejected the sale deeds whic...

...Stamp Act, the respondents herein can raise such objection at any time in view of the power under Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC and prayed to dismiss the revision...otherwise entitled to claim the relief.11. Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC deals with power of the Court to reject irrelevant or inadmissible document ...an illegality. Even otherwise at any stage of the suit, the Court may reject any document which it considers irrelevant or otherwise in admissible in view of Order 13 Rule 3 ...

...Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC and prayed to dismiss the revision petition confirming the order passed by the trial Court.9. The suit document is styled...or misquoting of a provision is not a ground to reject the petition, if, the petitioner is otherwise entitled to claim the relief.10. Order 13 Rule 3 of ...it considers irrelevant or otherwise in admissible in view of Order 13 Rule 3 CPC.26. In M. Narasimhulu's case (12 supra), single Judge of this...

...in Case No.RCSA/70/2022 by Ist Civil Judge, Junior Division, District-Burhanpur (MP) by which applications under Order 7 Rule 14(3) of the CPC and Order 13 Rule 10 of th.... 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that petitioner had filed an application under Order 13 Rule 10 of the CPC for production of record i.e. original a...the application under Order 13 Rule 10 of the CPC. 7. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 08.07.2025 (Annexure-P/1) is set aside....

...there is no ingredient whatsoever to invoke Order 13 Rule 3 of CPC at this stage is not maintainable. In support of his case, the respondent produced a Judgemen...rejection of Ex.P.1 is not maintainable.13. Considering both sides arguments, the learned Principal District Munsif Court, Cuddalore, by an order dated 20.08.2014 dismissing the application...fair and decretal order in E.A No. 319 of 2014 in E.A No. 277 of 2010 in E.P …. of 2010 in O.S No. 261 of 1991 dated 20.08.2014 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore...