Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

VICTOR M. FOUCAULT v. JOHN PINET

Profits and remaining assets

$ 2,720 42

One half of excess received by plaintiff

104 56

$ 2,615 86

Half thereof

$ 1,307 93

         JUDGES: Niles, J.

         OPINION

          NILES, Judge

         There is an error apparent upon the face of the report of the Commissioner. The plaintiff should have had judgment for one thousand two hundred and fifty-five dollars and sixty-five cents, with interest from its date at seven per cent per annum and costs.

         Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the Court below to modify its judgment in accordance with this opinion. Remittitur forthwith.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Foucault v. Pinet
(Jan 1, 1872)