Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales S.A. v. McGrath

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Civ. 4360-48

Attorney(S)

          Whiteford, Hart, Carmody & Wilson, Washington, D. C., John J. Wilson, Washington, D. C., Donald Hiss, Spencer Gordon, Washington, D. C., attorneys for plaintiff.           Harold I. Baynton, Deputy Dir. Office of Alien Property, Washington, D. C., David Schwartz, Special Asst. to Atty. Gen., Sidney B. Jacoby, Chicago Ill., Paul E. McGraw, New York City, David A. Wilson, Jr., Washington, D. C., Olga H. Hoffmann, Washington, D. C., Anthony W. Gross, Washington, D. C., for defendants.          Homer Cummings, J. Edward Burroughs, Jr., George C. Pendleton, Washington, D. C., Frank C. Sterck, Washington, D. C., attorneys for Intervenor.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Civ. 4360-48

Attorney(S)

          Whiteford, Hart, Carmody & Wilson, Washington, D. C., John J. Wilson, Washington, D. C., Donald Hiss, Spencer Gordon, Washington, D. C., attorneys for plaintiff.           Harold I. Baynton, Deputy Dir. Office of Alien Property, Washington, D. C., David Schwartz, Special Asst. to Atty. Gen., Sidney B. Jacoby, Chicago Ill., Paul E. McGraw, New York City, David A. Wilson, Jr., Washington, D. C., Olga H. Hoffmann, Washington, D. C., Anthony W. Gross, Washington, D. C., for defendants.          Homer Cummings, J. Edward Burroughs, Jr., George C. Pendleton, Washington, D. C., Frank C. Sterck, Washington, D. C., attorneys for Intervenor.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

SOCIETE INTERNATIONAL POUR PARTICIPATIONS INDUSTRIELLES ET COMMERCIALES S. A. et al. v. McGRATH et al. (REMINGTON RAND, Inc., Inter

BAILEY, District Judge.

Upon consideration of the emergent motion of the plaintiff to be excused, on the ground of foreign law or foreign privilege, from answering, through Hans Sturzenegger, the questions which this Court, by order dated November 7, 1949, directed that Hans Sturzenegger answer, and after hearing the parties, it is hereby.

Ordered that the motion of the plaintiff be and it is hereby denied and that the said questions be answered. The ground for this order is not that the questions have been ordered to be answered, but that foreign law or foreign privilege is not a valid excuse for a refusal to answer the questions.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

SOCIETE INTERNATIONAL POUR PARTICIPATIONS INDUSTRIELLES ET COMMERCIALES S. A. et al. v. McGRATH et al. (REMINGTON RAND, Inc., Inter

Comments