Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Juan Manuel PALACIO, III, Defendant and Appellant

Per Curiam.

James A. Hope, Assistant State's Attorney, Dickinson, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Samuel A. Gereszek, East Grand Forks, MN, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Juan Manuel Palacio III appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of drug paraphernalia and criminal conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. Palacio argues the state presented insufficient evidence to uphold the jury's verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). State v. Gray, 2017 ND 108, ¶¶ 15–16, 893 N.W.2d 484 (affirming judgment where appellant failed to provide a trial transcript on appeal, making it "impossible for this Court to conduct a meaningful and intelligent review" whether the defendant preserved for appeal the issue of insufficiency of the evidence or whether sufficient evidence supported the verdict).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Palacio
(Dec 7, 2017)