AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Temple L. TAYLOR, respondent, v. Da

Cerussi & Spring, White Plains, N.Y. (Richard D. Bentzen of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth A. LaBarca, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered*903 September 30, 2010, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability is denied, without prejudice to renewal upon the completion of discovery.

Under the facts of this case, it was premature for the Supreme Court to grant the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability prior to the exchange of any discovery ( see CPLR 3212[f]; Babcock v. Roche, 262 A.D.2d 512, 512–513, 691 N.Y.S.2d 343; McNally v. Fitzgerald, 260 A.D.2d 355, 356, 686 N.Y.S.2d 313; Hentschel v. Robert Campbell Carpet Servs., 256 A.D.2d 500, 500–501, 682 N.Y.S.2d 417; Barletta v. Lewis, 237 A.D.2d 238, 655 N.Y.S.2d 389). Accordingly, the motion should have been denied, without prejudice to renewal upon the completion of discovery.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendant's remaining contentions. RIVERA, J.P., LEVENTHAL, BELEN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Taylor v. Krebs
(Dec 6, 2011)