AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In re Ebony THORTON, Petitioner–Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent–Respondent, Youth Action Homes I, Respondent.

TOM


Ebony Thornton, appellant pro se. Kelly D. MacNeal, New York (Marisa D. Shemi of counsel), for New York City Housing Authority, respondent.
TOM, J.P., SAXE, RICHTER, ABDUS–SALAAM, FEINMAN, JJ.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur Engoron, J.), entered November 28, 2011, denying the petition seeking to annul the determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority to terminate petitioner's Section 8 rent subsidy, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner received the Notice of Final Determination in April 2011 advising her that her Section 8 rent subsidy had been terminated. However, she did not commence this proceeding until October 2011, which was more than two months after the statute of limitations had expired ( see Matter of Delgado v. New York City Hous. Auth., 88 A.D.3d 521, 931 N.Y.S.2d 211 [1st Dept. 2011];CPLR 217[1] ). This Court cannot extend the statute of limitations ( seeCPLR 201), nor does it have discretion to address the merits of petitioner's other arguments ( see Matter of M & D Contrs. v. New York City Dept. of Health, 233 A.D.2d 230, 231, 649 N.Y.S.2d 712 [1st Dept. 1996] ).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Thorton v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.
(Nov 27, 2012)