Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ELLISON v. GERMAN AND COLDWELL.

Upon appeal from the County Court by the defendant, if the jury in the Appellate Court finds the verdict below too large, they will calculate interest up to the rendition of their verdict, and judgment will he given for that sum. In all other cases, they will return the amount of the verdict below, or what ought to have been the verdict, and the Court will affirm this judgment, and allow twelve and a half percent. [See Nichols v. Colville, ante, 81.]

The jury asked the advice of the Court as to their mode of finding, so as to make it accord with the Act of Assembly allowing twelve and a half per cent upon all judgments brought up from the county courts, which shall be affirmed in the superior court.

Per Curiam.

The jury will consider the debt and interest up to the time of the verdict in the County Court. If they find the same sum, the judgment must be affirmed by the Court here, with an allowance of twelve and a half per cent. In this case, the jury will not calculate further than to the time of the judgment in the County Court. If upon calculation they find that a less sum was allowed in the County Court than the plaintiff was entitled to, they will calculate principal and interest to that time, and find the sum which should have been found in the County Court. The Court will affirm this judgment, and allow twelve and a half per cent. But if the jury should think there was judgment for too great, a sum, they will calculate principal and interest to this time. In this case, the judgment will not be affirmed, nor twelve and a half per cent allowed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ELLISON v. GERMAN AND COLDWELL
(May 1, 1805)