AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAM W. TABOR, Plaintiff in Error, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Defendant in Error.

DANFORTH, J.

The decision does not stand upon a modern rule, but one which, for aught that appears, has been always declared by courts to be the law. (1 Chit. Cr. L. 747; People v. Merrill, 14 N.Y. 74.) It is also recognized by statute (2 R.S., Pt. IV, chap. 2, art. 2, §§ 14, 15), and we know of no authority which will sustain a writ of error in a criminal case until after final judgment.

The writ in this case was, therefore, properly dismissed, and the order appealed from should be affirmed.

All concur.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TABOR v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
(Oct 17, 1882)