Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE NATIONAL BANK, OF VERNON, TEXAS, v. WAXAHACHIE NATIONAL BANK.

Appeal — Final Judgment.

A judgment which fails to dispose of the rights of a party properly made defendant and against whom specific and appropriate relief is asked in the petition is not final and will not support an appeal.

KEY, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE.

Opinion. — Appellee, as plaintiff, brought this suit against the State National Bank of Vernon, R.B. Gaut, F.M. Mabry and A.U. Thomas, as defendants.

The original petition connects the defendant Thomas as purchaser under a sale made by defendant Mabry as trustee, with the transaction which, in part, forms the basis of the plaintiff's suit; and specific and appropriate relief is asked in said petition as against Thomas; and we find nothing in the record showing that the plaintiff dismissed as to him.

The judgment recites that the defendant A.U. Thomas was duly cited; that he failed to answer, but made default; but it nowhere disposes of him as a party to the suit, nor of the cause of action set forth against him in the plaintiff's petition.

Such being the case, it is not a final judgment, and therefore this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal. Simpson v. Bennett, 42 Tex. 241; Linn v. Arambauld, 55 Tex. 611 [ 55 Tex. 611]; Railway v. Railway, 68 Tex. 98; Mignon v. Brinson, 74 Tex. 18; Mills v. Paul, 23 S.W. Rep., 189; Mills v. Paul, 23 S.W. Rep., 395. The appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BANK v. BANK
(Jun 3, 1896)