Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HENRY STAPLES, Executor, vs. LEVI STAPLES et al.

When a mortgagor remains in the possession of the mortgaged premises for more than twenty years, without paying interest on the mortgage note, or recognizing it as an existing obligation, there is a presumption that the mortgage has been paid or released.

PER CURIAM.

The testimony shows that the mortgagor has remained in possession of the mortgaged premises for more than twenty years, without the payment of interest, or a recognition by him of the mortgage as an existing obligation. These facts give rise to a presumption that the mortgage has been paid or released. 2 Jones Mort. 4 ed. §§ 1195, 1196. Consistently with this presumption, the respondent, Levi Staples, testifies that his mother, the mortgagee, forgave him the mortgage debt, and in this he is corroborated by the testimony of his wife, and also of his brother Charles. We think, therefore, that the bill must be dismissed with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STAPLES v. STAPLES
(Oct 21, 1897)