Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ELIAS WARN, Respondent, v. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

WERNER, J.

This is not a unanimous affirmance. The cases of Harroun v. Brush El. Light Co. ( 152 N.Y. 212) and McDonnell v. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. ( 159 N.Y. 524) are not in conflict with this decision. In the former case, the record recited four justices as sitting, and they all concurred; in the latter case, all the justices composing the court heard the argument, but one of them died before it was decided. In this case one of the sitting justices did not vote, although he had the right to do so.

The motion should be denied, with ten dollars costs.

PARKER, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, VANN, LANDON and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

Motion denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WARN v. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. CO
(Jun 22, 1900)