Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STRAHAN v. De SOTO PAINT MFG. CO.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Presentation Below — Necessity. Errors alleged to have occurred at the trial in the lower court, unless the same are excepted to, will not be considered on review in this court.

(Syllabus by Rittenhouse, C.)

Opinion by RITTENHOUSE, C.

This is an action upon two promissory notes. The defendant answered, setting up: (1) A material alteration of the notes; and (2) fraudulent representations as to the quality of the paint for which the notes were given. The questions presented are founded upon the sustaining of a demurrer to the evidence in support of the second defense; but, inasmuch as no objection was made to the sustaining of such demurrer nor exception saved to such ruling, there is nothing for us to decide. It is well settled in this jurisdiction that errors occurring at the trial not excepted to will not be reviewed on appeal. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Reed, 35 Okla. 334, 130 P. 157; Hailey v. Bowman, 41 Okla. 294, 137 P. 722.

The judgment should therefore be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STRAHAN v. De SOTO PAINT MFG. CO
(Jan 18, 1916)