Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL HOLZMAN, Appellant.

Per Curiam.

The record in this case fails to disclose facts sufficient to justify a conclusion that the defendant made or had in his possession tools under circumstances evincing an intent to use or employ, or allow the same to be used or employed, in the commission of a crime, or that he had knowledge that the said tools were intended to be so used.

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted.

HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur; POUND, J., absent.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HOLZMAN
(Dec 13, 1921)