Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

COURTRIGHT v. LEGISLATIVE STATUTORY COMMISSION ET AL.

1. APPELLATE PROCEDURE — Divided Court. One justice not participating and the others being equally divided in opinion as to what disposition should be made of the case, the judgment is affirmed by operation of law.

PER CURIAM.

This case has been heard and considered, Mr. Justice Knous not participating. Mr. Chief Justice Burke, Mr. Justice Bouck and Mr. Justice Bakke are in favor of affirmance, whereas Mr. Justice Hilliard, Mr. Justice Young and Mr. Justice Holland are in favor of reversal. As the case therefore stands affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court (Code '21, § 439), no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or of the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COURTRIGHT v. LEGISLATIVE COM
(Feb 15, 1937)