AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

FRANK R. McKEEBY, Respondent, v. MAX BAER, ANCIL HOFFMAN, ROBERT OSBORNE and "MARY" OSBORNE, etc., Appellants, Impleaded with JERRY CASSALE, Defendant. GERTRUDE WALLIS, Respondent,

The order was made upon the ground that the convenience of witnesses will be served and the ends of justice promoted by the change. Each of the actions arose out of the same accident. The order has ample support on the record, and was justified particularly to promote the ends of justice. The fact that a previous order had been made changing the venue of one action from Broome county to Fulton county did not deprive the Special Term of power to act. The situation involving three actions was materially different. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs. Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss and Foster, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., dissents on the ground that the Special Term had no authority to grant the order. [See ante, p. 813.]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McKEEBY v. BAER
(Sep 18, 1940)