Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MINNIE F. COHEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. MAX KAFER, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court in a workman's compensation case. The case as presented is purely one of fact. There being testimony to support the finding of the Supreme Court, this court will not weigh the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Porter for the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COHEN v. KAFER
(Mar 23, 1944)