Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Marion O. Kane and George Ortseifen, Appellants, v. City of Chicago, Appellee.

HIGHWAYS AND STREETS, § 176 — action for property damage arising from bridge improvement. In action against city for property damage, resulting from superstructure of bridge passing plaintiffs' property 12 feet above normal grade, thus interfering with plaintiffs' right to egress and ingress, rendering its property inaccessible, excavation having weakened lateral support for plaintiffs' property which was located, before improvement, in warehousing district, held that judgment should go for defendant, since while superstructure and stairway darkened sidewalks, jury may have believed that whatever damage was suffered in this respect was neutralized by benefits from covering superstructure afforded sidewalks, since modern warehousing loading facilities are recessed, plaintiffs' damages were not special for they were same as rest of public, and bridge did not detract from value of property.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by JUSTICE KILEY.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed February 14, 1945; rehearing denied March 5, 1945; released for publication March 5, 1945.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KANE v. CITY OF CHICAGO
(Feb 14, 1945)