Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Sack, Appellant, v. Glens Falls Insurance Company.

Insurance — Fraud of insured — Pleadings — Issue — Evidence.

In an action on an insurance policy, in which the issue was whether or not the insured was guilty of fraud, it was Held that (1) the trial judge did not commit reversible error in charging on the issue of fraud; (2) the pleadings raised the issue of fraud on the part of plaintiff, and there was evidence to sustain a finding that plaintiff was guilty of fraud; and (3) defendant had not waived the defense of fraud.

PER CURIAM, November 8, 1948:

The judgment of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge PATTERSON.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SACK v. GLENS FALLS INS. CO
(Nov 8, 1948)