BONDAR v. SIMMONS CO, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. O'Brien, Brett O'Brien, attorneys). Mr. Mortimer Wald argued the cause for the respondent.

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. O'Brien, Brett O'Brien, attorneys). Mr. Mortimer Wald argued the cause for the respondent.

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

JOHN BONDAR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SIMMONS COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conlon in the court below.

HEHER, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.