Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE KRAMER: KRAMER, APPELLANT v. ALVIS, WARDEN, APPELLEE.

Habeas corpus — Not available to review irregularities in verdict — Adequate remedy afforded by appeal.

Per Curiam.

The issue of the irregularity or validity of the verdict could have been determined on appeal in the criminal action. The remedy as to errors or irregularities in the conduct of a criminal trial or in the sentence of an accused is by appeal and not by an action in habeas corpus, where the court has jurisdiction of the crime and the person. In re Whitmore, 137 Ohio St. 313, 29 N.E.2d 363; Ex parte Van Hagan, 25 Ohio St. 426; Section 2725.05, Revised Code.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE KRAMER
(Jun 8, 1955)