STATE v. LANISH, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Remo M. Croce, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney). Mr. Victor Friedman argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Louis A. Smith on the brief).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Remo M. Croce, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney). Mr. Victor Friedman argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Louis A. Smith on the brief).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MATTHEW LANISH,DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division, 103 N.J. Super. 441.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN. — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.