Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

ROY BRAXTON JAMES v. GREENWAY, INC.

Appeal and Error 39 — failure to file record on appeal in apt time Appeal is dismissed for failure to file the record on appeal within ninety days after the date of the order appealed from. Court of Appeals Rule 5.

In this action plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $6,000.00, plus interest, on a promisory note. Defendant answered and in the answer set up a counterclaim.

Plaintiff moved to quash the pleadings of the defendant and for the relief requested in the complaint for that the pleadings of defendant were not timely filed and served.

By order dated and filed 17 May 1972 Judge Wells denied the relief sought by plaintiff, and plaintiff appealed.

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The order appealed from was dated and filed 17 May 1972. The Rules of Practice in this Court require the record on appeal to be docketed within ninety (90) days after the date of the judgment, order, decree or determination appealed from unless the trial tribunal, for good cause, extends the time not exceeding sixty (60) days. Rule 5. In the instant case no extension of time was procured from the trial tribunal, and the ninety (90) days expired 15 August 1972. The record on appeal was not filed in this Court until 21 August 1972 and was therefore not timely filed. Dixon v. Dixon, 6 N.C. App. 623, 170 S.E.2d 561 (1969); Kurtz v. Insurance Co., 6 N.C. App. 625, 170 S.E.2d 496 (1969).

For failure to comply with the rules of this Court

Appeal dismissed.

Judges MORRIS and PARKER concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JAMES v. GREENWAY, INC
(Dec 1, 1972)