Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

VINCENT J. SCOTT, APPELLANT, v. CHIEF OF POLICE AND FOUR OTHER UNNAMED BRECKENRIDGE HILLS, MISSOURI, POLICEMEN, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order of Judge Meredith denying appellant's request for appointment of counsel to assist appellant in the prosecution of a civil rights suit. Appellant is presently incarcerated in the Federal Penitentiary in Leavenworth, Kansas.

Before this Court may reach the merits of the appeal and review the question of whether the denial of appointment of counsel was an abuse of discretion by Judge Meredith, this Court must find the order of denial was a final order within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Peterson v. Nadler, 452 F.2d 754 (8th Cir. 1971). The Peterson rule requires that the order appealed from will result in irreparable harm to appellant.

In this case, the record is silent as to the need of appellant for counsel and the irreparable effects, if any, that will flow from the denial of appointment of counsel. The Court will therefore remand the case to Judge Meredith for the limited purpose of expanding the record in that regard, after which this Court will again entertain the appeal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCOTT v. CHIEF OF POLICE
(Mar 5, 1974)