SULLIVAN v. UNITED STATES

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 84-806.

Attorney(S)

Robert A. Reutershan, Washington, D.C., argued for
With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting
,
David M. Cohen, Washington, D.C.,
Roxanne Ando, Washington, D.C., of Office of the
Counsel
of
, of
John Salter, Washington, D.C., of Office of the
Counsel Office of Personnel
Steven M. Schneebaum, Washington, D.C., argued for
With him on the brief was Lisa A. Shapiro, Washington, D.C.

Judges

Howard Thomas Markey
Giles Sutherland Rich
Marion Tinsley Bennett

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 84-806.

Attorney(S)

Robert A. Reutershan, Washington, D.C., argued for
With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting
,
David M. Cohen, Washington, D.C.,
Roxanne Ando, Washington, D.C., of Office of the
Counsel
of
, of
John Salter, Washington, D.C., of Office of the
Counsel Office of Personnel
Steven M. Schneebaum, Washington, D.C., argued for
With him on the brief was Lisa A. Shapiro, Washington, D.C.

Judges

Howard Thomas Markey
Giles Sutherland Rich
Marion Tinsley Bennett

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CANDACE J. SULLIVAN, APPELLEE, v. THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the United States Claims Court which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and denied defendant's motion to dismiss this claim for severance pay. We affirm.

OPINION

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the Claims Court. Sullivan v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 70 (1983).

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

CANDACE J. SULLIVAN, APPELLEE, v. THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANT.

Comments