Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Carl M. FIVEASH v. STATE of Arkansas

1. ATTORNEY'S FEES — WHEN MOTION SHOULD BE FILED — EFFECT OF LATE FILING. — Failure to file the motion for attorney's fees in time for it to be considered at the time the case is considered on its merits could prevent the allowance of an attorney's fee. 2. ATTORNEY'S FEES — LATE MOTION — NO FEES AWARDED. — Where eight months have elapsed since the case was decided and a new fiscal year has intervened, attorney's fees will not be awarded.

PER CURIAM.

On February 1, 1984, we affirmed the trial court's judgment in the above styled case. On October 4, 1984, appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a motion for attorney's fee.

In Cristee v. State, 4 Ark. App. 33, 627 S.W.2d 34 (1982), we said that motions for attorney's fees in these cases should be filed in this court in time for them to be considered at the time the case is considered on its merits. Two years later, in Stefanovich v. State, 10 Ark. App. 233, 662 S.W.2d 476 (1984), we called attention to Cristee and pointed out that failure to file the motion in time for it to be considered at the time the case is considered on its merits could prevent the allowance of an attorney's fee.

We allowed a fee in both of those cases, but the motions were filed within three months of the case decision and in the same fiscal year. Here, eight months have elapsed and on July 1, 1984, a new fiscal year intervened.

Our power to allow the fee at this late date is suspect; moreover, we do not think one should be allowed under the circumstances.

Motion denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FIVEASH v. STATE
(Oct 17, 1984)