Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ARTHUR O. FRANKLIN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Notwithstanding this court's prior remand of this case with instructions to the trial court to resentence the appellant in conformity with the provisions of § 39.111(6), Fla. Stat. (1983), see, Franklin v. State, 476 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), we find the case again before us on a record which does not include a written statement of reasons justifying imposition of adult sanctions as is required by § 39.111(6)(d). Accordingly, we again reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

JOANOS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FRANKLIN v. STATE
(Dec 16, 1986)