AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES MEREDITH, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

While we agree that certain of the prosecutor's comments during his summation which seemed intended to arouse sympathy for the complaining witness were improper, the remarks do not warrant reversal because they did not deny the defendant a fair trial (see, People v. Roopchand, 107 A.D.2d 35, affd 65 N.Y.2d 837). The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for review or lacking in merit. Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Niehoff and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MEREDITH
(Mar 23, 1987)