AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of NORSTAR TRUST COMPANY, Formerly SECURITY TRUST COMPANY, as Executor of MAY BELLINGHAM, Deceased.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The Surrogate erred in denying the motion to dismiss the petition. The proceeding is one seeking discovery and the recovery of money and other personal property pursuant to SCPA 2103. The petition alleges no fraud or other bad-faith conduct on the part of appellant nor does it allege the four requirements for the imposition of a constructive trust (see, Sharp v. Kosmalski, 40 N.Y.2d 119, 121).

A discovery proceeding commenced pursuant to SCPA 2103 has been likened to a replevin action, which has a Statute of Limitations of three years (CPLR 214). In the absence of fraud, that time-limiting provision applies in a discovery proceeding (Matter of Dunbar, 49 A.D.2d 858, 859; Matter of Laflin, 128 Misc.2d 348, 349). In the period October 4, 1977 to November 22, 1980, various transfers of money and personal property were made by petitioner's decedent to appellant, William R. Schuster. The petitioner alleges that it became aware of the facts and circumstances concerning various transfers of money and other personal property between decedent and Schuster, in March 1982. Letters testamentary were issued to Norstar Trust Company on July 9, 1982. This action was commenced nearly four years later and is, therefore, time barred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF NORSTAR TRUST COMPANY
(Jul 10, 1987)