AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

BLUEPRINT PLUMBING CORPORATION, Respondent, v. KREISLER BORG FLORMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants, and RAYPAK, INC., et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from by United States Fire Insurance Company, on the law, and the plaintiff's application for legal fees is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeals of the defendants Raypak, Inc., and Cushing Equipment, Ltd., and the appeal of the defendant Webster Plumbing Supply, Inc., are dismissed, for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this court ( 22 NYCRR 670.20 [d], [f]).

Ordered that United States Fire Insurance Company is awarded one bill of costs payable by Blueprint Plumbing Corporation.

We agree with the defendant United States Fire Insurance Company that the Supreme Court erred as a matter of law in awarding legal fees to the plaintiff. It is the rule in this State that the award of legal fees "may not be had in an affirmative action brought by an injured to settle its rights * * * but only when the insured has been cast in a defensive posture by the legal steps an insurer takes in an effort to free itself from its policy obligations" (Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co., 47 N.Y.2d 12, 21; see also, Johnson v General Mut. Ins. Co., 24 N.Y.2d 42). Since the cause of action asserted against the United States Fire Insurance Company amounted to an affirmative action by the insured to settle its rights, the plaintiff was not entitled to an award of legal fees. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BLUEPRINT PLUMBING v. KREISLER BORG FLORMAN
(Feb 14, 1989)