Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. WINGATE.

Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Two-year suspension with twelve months stayed while placed on probation for that period, subject to supervision and monitoring as set forth in Gov. Bar R. V(23) — Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice — Conviction for obstructing official business — Removal of clients' criminal affidavits from the courthouse and keeping them in his possession, thus suspending all proceedings — Conduct contrary to a Disciplinary Rule.

Per Curiam.

We concur with the findings of the board; however, we modify the sanction. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years. However, we hereby stay the final twelve months of the suspension and place respondent on probation for that period, subject to relator's supervision and monitoring as set forth in Gov. Bar R. V(23). The terms of probation are that respondent handle criminal affidavits in the Toledo Municipal Court in strict conformity with rules and procedures adopted by that court and that he commit no other violation of law, the Code of Professional Responsibility, or Rules for the Government of the Bar. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS and WRIGHT, JJ., concur.

MOYER, C.J., H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., dissent and would order a one-year suspension, but would suspend the final six months of that period pending respondent's successful completion of a six-month supervised and monitored probation period.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TOLEDO BAR ASSN. v. WINGATE
(Jun 5, 1991)