Plaintiff's proof shows that public displays of disruptive behavior by defendant against its employees could cause harm to its restaurant patronage. The right to carry on a lawful business without obstruction is a property right, and acts committed without just cause or excuse that interfere with the carrying on of a business constitute an irreparable injury warranting the issuance of an injunction (Tappan Motors v. Waterbury, 65 Misc.2d 514; see also, Barclay's Ice Cream Co. v. Local No. 757, 51 A.D.2d 516, 517, affd 41 N.Y.2d 269, cert denied 436 U.S. 925).
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Ellerin, Asch and Rubin, JJ.