AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ADVANCE UNITED EXPRESSWAYS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion June 26, 5th Cir., 1992 965 F.2d 1347)

BY THE COURT:

To the extent that our opinion of June 26, 1992, 965 F.2d 1347, is in conflict with Reiter v. Cooper, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 1213, 122 L.Ed.2d 604 (1993), it has been overruled. In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED. The case is thus REMANDED to the district court for further consideration in the light of Reiter and of our opinion.

Finally, no active judge having requested that the court be polled, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ADV. UNITED EXPRESSWAYS v. EASTMAN KODAK CO
(Apr 22, 1993)