AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WALTER SUTTON, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The testimony concerning the defendant's uncharged crime and the introduction of the domestic violence form were relevant and material to explaining a motive and intent for the subsequent homicide (see, People v. Hutchinson, 179 A.D.2d 679; People v Hill, 163 A.D.2d 813; People v. Roides, 124 A.D.2d 967).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or relate to errors that are harmless. Sullivan, J.P., Miller, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SUTTON
(Oct 23, 1995)