Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

VITO COVELLI v. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SERVICES

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. We previously considered it in Covelli v. Commissioner of Revenue Services, 235 Conn. 539, 668 A.2d 699 (1995). On the plaintiff's petition for a writ of certiorari, the United States Supreme Court vacated our previous judgment; Covelli v. Crystal, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 2577, 135 L.Ed.2d 1092 (1996); and ordered us to reconsider it in light of United States v. Ursery, 518 U.S. 267, 116 S.Ct. 2135, 135 L.Ed.2d 549 (1996). Having reconsidered, we affirm our prior judgment.

KATZ, J., dissenting.

With whom, BERDON, J., joins.

The United States Supreme Court, in Covelli v. Crystal, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 2577, 135 L.Ed.2d 1092 (1996), vacated the judgment of this court in Covelli v. Commissioner of Revenue Services, 235 Conn. 539, 668 A.2d 699 (1995), and remanded the case for our reconsideration. I disagree with the majority that our prior judgment should be affirmed, and I take this opportunity to restate my opinion that the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment to the United States constitution was violated when the plaintiff, following his judgment of conviction for possession of illicit drugs, was assessed a tax pursuant to Connecticut's Marijuana and Controlled Substances Tax Act, General Statutes §§ 12-650 through 12-660.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COVELLI v. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SERVICES
(Nov 12, 1996)