Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EILEEN M. BRAKE, Appellant, vs. EVE E. MURPHY, et al., Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We dispose of the several orders now on appeal in this interminable litigation as follows: (1) The order awarding attorney's fees for services performed in securing the judgment which has since been reversed in Brake v. Murphy, ___ So.2d ___ (Fla. 3d DCA Case no. 96-824, opinion filed, December 26, 1996)[22 FLW D64], is necessarily likewise reversed. (2) The order denying Rule 1.540 relief is affirmed. (3) The attempted review of a non-appealable order denying a motion for a more definite statement is dismissed. (4) The sua sponte order purporting to partially deprive Mrs. Brake of her share in the estate is reversed as both procedurally and substantively unauthorized.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, dismissed in part.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRAKE v. MURPHY
(Feb 12, 1997)